BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help: Powerprep question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Help: Powerprep question

by lunarpower » Sun May 04, 2008 11:32 am
caramel3536 wrote:Is rst =1?
(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1

ans E
(1)
insufficient, because you don't know anything about t

(2)
insufficient, because you don't know anything about r

(together)
if you multiply the two statements together, you get (r)(s^2)(t) = 1, but this isn't the same as rst = 1.
so, try to find contradictory examples:
if r = 1/2, s = 2, t = 1/2, then rst = 1/2 (so doesn't equal 1)
if r = s = t = 1, then rst = 1
insufficient

answer = e
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by caramel3536 » Sun May 04, 2008 2:07 pm
Thanks a lot
Join the discussion

by anniev2 » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:27 pm
Why can't the equations provided in the statement be plugged into the given:

Is rst=1

(Statement 1) rs=1

Substituting values in equation:
1 x t =1
1t=1
t=1
- if we know that rs = 1 and t = 1 then we know that rst = 1

...
same can be done for the second statement. Why is this unacceptable?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:47 am
anniev2 wrote:Why can't the equations provided in the statement be plugged into the given:

Is rst=1

(Statement 1) rs=1

Substituting values in equation:
1 x t =1
1t=1
t=1
- if we know that rs = 1 and t = 1 then we know that rst = 1

...
same can be done for the second statement. Why is this unacceptable?
"Is rst = 1?" is the question; it's not a fact that you can use. If you do assume "rst = 1" is true here, it should not be a surprise to discover that rst is equal to 1 -- that's what's called 'begging the question' in logic (assuming the answer to a question is yes, then proving the answer is yes).

When you plug rs = 1 into the question to find "t = 1", all you are doing is rephrasing the question. That is, if we use Statement 1 here, our question becomes: "is t equal to 1?" Since we don't know if that's true, Statement 1 is not sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by HPengineer » Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:52 pm
I used the following method that all three numbers are 1 and that based on the statements they just have to be the same sign.

From stm 1 R x S = 1

could be -R x -S = 1 or R x S = 1


From stm2

could be S x T = 1 and -S x -T = 1

Stm 1 & 2 together
you can have RST = 1 or -R-S-T = -1

Did i get lucky here or is this a valid approach?
Join the discussion