BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - Inequality

Expert replies
by achieve_dream » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:03 pm
If 2p != -q, is ((2p-q)/(2p+q)) > 1?

(1). p < 0
(2). q > 0

I did this:
2p-q > 2p+q

Cancelled like terms on left and right sides of inequality.

=> 0 > 2q => q < 0

and concluded that by knowing the sign of q, I will be able to give answer the question.

But I was wrong and should not have cancelled the like terms on on left and right sides of inequality.

Can experts help me to decide when to cancel terms and when to not cancel terms on left and right sides of inequality?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:32 pm
achieve_dream wrote:If 2p != -q, is ((2p-q)/(2p+q)) > 1?

(1). p < 0
(2). q > 0

I did this:
2p-q > 2p+q

Cancelled like terms on left and right sides of inequality.

=> 0 > 2q => q < 0

and concluded that by knowing the sign of q, I will be able to give answer the question.

But I was wrong and should not have cancelled the like terms on on left and right sides of inequality.

Can experts help me to decide when to cancel terms and when to not cancel terms on left and right sides of inequality?
Combining like terms is fine - the problem isn't there, but rather in the initial transition from ((2p-q)/(2p+q)) > 1?
to 2p-q > 2p+q in the first place. What you are doing is multiplying the inequality by 2p+q. The problem is that you can't multiply an inequality by a unknown without knowing the unknown's sign: If sp+q is positive, then you can multiply without any changes, BUT if 2p+q is negative, you would need to flip the inequality sign because of multiplying by a negative number. Thus, without any indication of whether wp+q is positive or negative, you can't multiply because you don't know what to do with the sign.

This is in fact the issue of the question. Given that p<0 and q>0, the numerator of the fraction (2p-q) will always be negative. However, the denominator 2p+q can be positive or negative, depending on the value of p and q.
if 2p-q is positive, then the fraction is pos / neg will definitely be <1, and the answer is "no"
If 2p-q is negative, then (2p-q)/(2p+q) will be neg / neg = pos. Not only that, but the numerator will be "more negative" than the denominator (greater in absolute value), so the fraction will end up >1, with an answer of "yes". Thus, the answer is E.

Main takeaway from this question: Do not multiply or divide an inequality by an unknown, unless you know the unknown's sign.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by achieve_dream » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:24 pm
Thankyou Geva.
BTW, the official answer is also E as Geva said.

Source: Veritas Prep Practice test
Join the discussion