(x-y)/(x+y)>1------> (x-y)/(x+y)-1>0------->-2y/(x+y)>0
we need to know relationship b/n x and y and whether y >0??
s1) only about x not suff
s2) only about y we need to know relationship b/n x and y not suff
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Inequality prob
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
re-writing problem statement:selango wrote:If x is not equal to y,is (x-y)/(x+y)>1 ?
A)x>0
B)y<0
OA E
(x-y)/(x+y)>1
(x+y-2y)/(x+y)>1
1 - (2y/(x+y)) >1
2y/(x+y) < 0
using 1 alone, x>0
x = 3, y = -2 statement is true
x = 1, y = 2 statement is false. so insufficient
using 2 alone, y<0
x = 3, y = -2 statement is true
x = 1, y = -2 statement is false, so insufficient
using both x>0 and y<0
x = 3, y = -2 statement is true
x = 1, y = -2 statement is false, so insufficient
so,
E
question is
is (x-y)/(x+y)>1
or [-y/(x+y)]>0
this is possible when -y and (x+y) will have same sign
both conditions mentions about the sign of either x or y but not both ,hence either alone is not sufficient
combining
y<0..so -y>0
x>=..but no information about if |x|>|Y| which is necessary to deduce whether (x+y)>0 ..hence not sufficient
Ans option E
is (x-y)/(x+y)>1
or [-y/(x+y)]>0
this is possible when -y and (x+y) will have same sign
both conditions mentions about the sign of either x or y but not both ,hence either alone is not sufficient
combining
y<0..so -y>0
x>=..but no information about if |x|>|Y| which is necessary to deduce whether (x+y)>0 ..hence not sufficient
Ans option E
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Lewis Carroll
Guys,
Need your help on this one...
Can you tell me what is the flaw in the logic that I am using ?
(x-y)/(x+y) >1
= (x-y) > (x+y)
= 0 > 2y
or y<0
Thanks
Need your help on this one...
Can you tell me what is the flaw in the logic that I am using ?
(x-y)/(x+y) >1
= (x-y) > (x+y)
= 0 > 2y
or y<0
Thanks
The problem with inequalities is that when you multiply or divide by a negtive number, you need to flip the sign. If (x+y) is negative, then you would need to flip the sign and getTOPGMAT wrote:Guys,
Need your help on this one...
Can you tell me what is the flaw in the logic that I am using ?
(x-y)/(x+y) >1
= (x-y) > (x+y)
= 0 > 2y
or y<0
Thanks
(x-y)/(x+y) >1 --> (x-y) < (x+y)
but if (x+y) is positive, then the sign remains as is, and your logic holds.
the answer is E because even if you know that x>o and y<0, you still don't know whether the sum x+y is positive or negative - that will depend on the relative absolute value of x and y:
If x=2, y=-3, then x+y=2-3=-1 is negative, and you need to flip the sign when multiplying by (x+y)
But
If x=10 and y=-3, then x+y=10-3=7, and the sign remains the same when multiplying by (x+y)
















