BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmat practice question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by clock60 » Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:42 pm
looks like A
(1) x^2-4x+3<0, (x-1)(x-3)<0 given is valid for x 1<x<3, and the only integer inside is 2. so x=2 suff
(2) x^2+4x+3>0, (x+1)(x+3)>0 valid for x<-3, x>-1 many integers are possible insuff
Join the discussion

by nasir » Sun Oct 24, 2010 7:25 pm
clock60 wrote:looks like A
(1) x^2-4x+3<0, (x-1)(x-3)<0 given is valid for x 1<x<3, and the only integer inside is 2. so x=2 suff
/quote]


x-1 <0 => x<1
x-3<0 => x<3

how you made the relation 1<x<3
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:28 pm
Consider first (1) alone.
x^2 - 4x + 3 < 0 implies (x-3)(x-1) < 0.
This means case (1) (x-3) > 0 and (x-1) < 0 which is x > 3 and x < 1.
This is not possible since no real number can be greater than 3 and less than 1. This case is hence eliminated.
Or
case (2) (x-3) < 0 and (x-1) > 0 which is x<3 and x > 1.
This is same as 1<x<3.
We accept case (2).
If x is an integer, the only possible value is x = 2.
Hence (1) alone is sufficient to answer the question.
Next consider (2) alone.
x^2 + 4x + 3 > 0.
This means (x+1)(x+3) > 0.
So we have case (1) x+1 > 0 and x+3>0 which is x> -1 and x> -3.
So combining we have x > -1.
Or
case (2) x+1 < 0 and x+3 < 0 which is x<-1 and x<-3.
On combining we have that x< -3 .
Hence from (2) we get that either x< -3 or x> -1.
There can be infinite many values of x if x is an integer.
So (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

The correct answer is (A).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:44 am
nasir wrote:
clock60 wrote:looks like A
(1) x^2-4x+3<0, (x-1)(x-3)<0 given is valid for x 1<x<3, and the only integer inside is 2. so x=2 suff
/quote]


x-1 <0 => x<1
x-3<0 => x<3

how you made the relation 1<x<3
Guys please explain , We both Don't know this rule.........
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:32 am
nasir wrote:If x is an integer, what is the value of x?

(1) x2 - 4x + 3 < 0
(2) x2 + 4x +3 > 0

Please explain

(1) x2 - 4x + 3 < 0

(x-1)(x-3)<0

Rule to remember:
Whenever (x-a)(x-b) <0 then x lies between a and b.
Whenever (x-a)(x-b)>0 then x does not lie between a and b.


From above, we can see that x is between 1 and 3.
Integer lying between 1 and 3 is only 2.
Hence x should be equal to 2.
SUFF

(2) x2 + 4x +3 > 0
(x+1)(x+3)>0

This means that x does not lie between -1 and -3.
Hence x can be any value >-1 or <-3
Hence INSUFF

pick A.

Hope this helps!!

Let me know if you have any troubles understanding this.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:40 am
kvcpk wrote:
(1) x2 - 4x + 3 < 0

(x-1)(x-3)<0

Rule to remember:
Whenever (x-a)(x-b) <0 then x lies between a and b.

if equation is like this. (x+a)(x+b) <0 Then x will lie in between a and b a < x < b

and if equation is like this. (x-a)(x+b) <0 Then x will lie in between -a < x < b
kvcpk wrote: Whenever (x-a)(x-b)>0 then x does not lie between a and b.
if equation is like this. (x+a)(x+b) >0 Then x will not lie in between a and b a> x, x< b

and if equation is like this. (x-a)(x+b) >0 Then x will lie in between -a > x, x < b

Please correct me if i am wrong.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:14 am
goyalsau wrote:
if equation is like this. (x+a)(x+b) <0 Then x will lie in between a and b a < x < b

Please correct me if i am wrong.
Grrr.... Man why do you need a Concrete formula always. Just give yourself sometime and analyse it (IMHO) ;)

(x+a)(x+b) <0

Let me take a = 2 and b = 3.

Thus, (x+2) (x+3) < 0
So x+2 < 0 and x+3 > 0 OR x+2 > 0 and x+3 < 0
So x < -2 and x > -3 OR x > -2 and x < -3

Consider x<-2 and x>-3. Which decimal will satisfy this? all in between -3 and -2 say x = -2.5

What happened here?

-3 < x < -2 but what is your a and b? a and b are 2 and 3 respectively.

In general what happened... -b < x < -a (Not what you have thought of "a < x < b")

Thus we can say the solution will be -b < x < -a OR a < -x < b.

One question to you why did I select only x < -2 and x > -3, NOT x > -2 and x < -3 ?

Please Analyse the other cases what ever you have mentioned in your earlier post ;)

PS: And also I hope I m correct. I have never encountered this so if it is wrong Sourabh please bear with me ;)
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:35 am
goyalsau wrote:
if equation is like this. (x+a)(x+b) <0 Then x will lie in between a and b a < x < b

and if equation is like this. (x-a)(x+b) <0 Then x will lie in between -a < x < b
Hi Saurabh,

I think you got me wrong. You missed on the sign before the values a and b.
If (x-a)(x-b)<0
then a<x<b
[Notice that signs before a and b are negative signs]

Ok, So what if (x+a)(x+b)<0??
We can rewrite it is (x- (-a))(x- (-b))<0
So x lies between -a and -b
-a<x<-b

If (x+a)(x-b)<0 then
-a<x<b
[Notice the positive sign before a in x+a]

If (x-a)(x+b)<0 then
-b<x<a
[Notice the positive sign before b in x+b]


Helpful?? If not let me know.

When >0, then the above funda remains same. Only change is that x does not lie in that range now.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by jeetu_vishnoi » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:11 pm
Answer is A.

first equation can be written as (x-3)(x-1)<0 which means that (x-3)<0 and (x-1)>0
it shows that x<3 and x>1 and it is given that x is integer hence x=2.

first equation can be written as (x+3)(x+1)<0 which means that either {(x+3)<0 and (x+1)<0} or {(x+3)>0 and (x+1)>0}
which clearly shows that it's not possible to decide tha value of x.
Join the discussion