could you please cite the source of the question???akhpad wrote:Q is in Image
Can someone explain?
thnx!!
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Next LiveTeach cohort7 seats left
Aug 22 to Nov 14, 2026 with Logan Thompson
Sat, 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM Eastern (ET) · 40 live hours plus six months of OnDemand included
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Hard CR
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
-
alivapriyada
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 146
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:560
thnx!!
truely a HARD 1, not able to make sense out of it, my sleep deprived brain not responding on this.... 
well.........
A & D are opposite to what the conclusion states...E is out of scope
So out of B & C......my pick is C
both B and C ....roughly talk of the same thing..........homes with alarms burglarized repeatedly over a five year period......but where imho C wins is that it talks of more likely to be burglarized....similarly to the conclusion which states....homeowners who outfit their homes with alarms are more likely to become victims.....
A & D are opposite to what the conclusion states...E is out of scope
So out of B & C......my pick is C
both B and C ....roughly talk of the same thing..........homes with alarms burglarized repeatedly over a five year period......but where imho C wins is that it talks of more likely to be burglarized....similarly to the conclusion which states....homeowners who outfit their homes with alarms are more likely to become victims.....
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
i dislike this kind of question, but i think i will choose Cakhpad wrote:Q is in Image
Can someone explain?
i wont explain why because i cant remmeber it in detail
anyways i also hate it when they post pictures or image of question or question typed in words....
we cant concentrate on the question to answer it
The answer is D in my opinion. Argument begins by assuming that having a burglar alarm ensures that homes are safe and therefore there is a less likelihood of a burglary. It then provides some figures and concludes that the case is opposite for Stockton.
