BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is |x|>|y|?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by this_time_i_will » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:18 pm
Stmt. II is clearly not sufficient.
If both x and y are negative and x>y, then |x|<|y|. for e.g. -2>-3, but |-2|<|-3|
If both x and y are positive and x>y, then |x|>|y|.

As you can see both the statement above gives different relationship between |x| and |y|, clearly B is insufficient.
Join the discussion

by Shiram » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:39 pm
Ok, thank you, not it's clear! I found that I barely understand this sign |x|.

What if there is a statement x^3>y^3, then |x|>|y| is true because the power is odd, right?
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:33 pm
Solution:
We need to know if lxl > lyl or not.
Consider first (1) alone.
It says x^2 > y^2.
Or (x^2 - y^2) > 0.
Or (x+y)(x-y) > 0.
There can be 2 cases.
Case (1) x+y > 0 and x-y > 0 which is x > -y and x >y.
This means x > 0 and x>lyl.
Or it means lxl > lyl
Case (2) x+y < 0 and x-y < 0 which is x < -y and x < y or -x > y and -x > -y.
This means x < 0 and -x > lyl.
Since lxl = -x if x < 0, we have lxl > lyl.
Since both cases give lxl > lyl, we get (1) alone is sufficient.
Next consider (2) alone.
Let x = 2, y = 1. So lxl = 2 and lyl = 1.
Here x > y and lxl > lyl.
Next let x = -3, y = -4. So lxl = 3 and lyl = 4.
Here x > y but lxl < lyl.
Since nothing definite can be said (2) alone is not sufficient.

The correct answer is (A).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:43 pm
What if there is a statement x^3>y^3, then |x|>|y| is true because the power is odd, right?

Not necessary.
Take same examples.
Let x = 3 and y = 2.
x^3 = 27 and y^3 = 8. lxl = 27 and lyl = 8
Here x^3 > y^3 and lxl > lyl.
Next let x = -3 and y = -4.
So x^3 = -27 and y^3 = -64. lxl = 3 and lyl = 4.
Here x^3 > y^3 but lxl < lyl.
Hence it is not sufficient.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Shiram » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:30 am
Rahul, thank you so much for such detailed explanation. At some point I thought that everything is clear for me, but then I realized that I'm mixed up with x^2>y^2

Let's take an example:
x=3, y=2
x^2>y^2 as 9>4, then |x|>|y|

if x = -2, y = -3

x>y,
but X^2<y^2, and then |x|<|y|

Could you please tell me where is my mistake, because according to my logic st. A in the first problem is incorrect, but it's not true!
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:31 pm
Actually when you are solving Data sufficiency problem, you are not supposed to ascertain whether statements (1) and (2) are correct or not.

You first note what has been asked in the main question?
You then take the statement (1) and try to find out whether you can answer the main question assuming (1) to be true. The same thing is then done for statement (2) and lastly for both statements combined if individually both statements do not give a definite reply.

In your solution you cannot take x = -2 and y = -3 because they are contradicting what is given in the statement (1) which is x^2 > y^2 since (x^2 = 4) < (y^2 = 9)
You need to take x and y such that x^2 > y^2.

Hope it is clearer.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion