BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS:line

Expert replies
by 7806 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:19 am
##
Lines n and p lie on the xy plane. Is the slope of line n less than slope of line p?
(1) Lines n and p intersect at (5, 1)
(2) The y-intercept of line n is greater than the y intercept of p

i am down with C/E...?? pl explain. thanks.

{ i think on -ve axis( say, -ve y axis)... if, y1=-4 and y2=-3, then y1 has greater y intercept than does y2). am i correct?.}
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:49 am
(1) We are given the point of intersection, but this does not give the slope of any lines.
So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) y-intercept of line n > y intercept of line p, but this does not give us any indication on the slopes of two lines.
So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2), if we take some points so that y-intercept of line n > y intercept of line p, which means higher line should be marked as n and lower should be p. So, the slope of n will always be less than slope of p.

The correct answer is [spoiler](C)[/spoiler].
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by 7806 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:47 am
thanks rahul...
my 2 Q-

1st: i think on -ve axis( say, -ve y axis)... if, y1=-4 and y2=-3, then y1 has greater y intercept than does y2). am i correct?.}

2nd-
ok.. say, intercept for line n=5, line p=3, and they passes from point(5,1). so, as i draw on rough paper a1(n)<a2(p); wherea1(n) angle for line n....

now, on -ve y axis, y=-5, p=-3 ... ( my 1st Q is related to this part)-i am considering that this time also y intercept is greater...considering absolute value.

so, when i draw line, a1(n)>a2(p).

..sorry, i am not able to draw fig.

..is considering absolute value is wrong...?? hope i may be..that why i am getting E.

pl confirm...!!! thanks.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:01 am
7806 wrote:thanks rahul...
my 2 Q-

1st: i think on -ve axis( say, -ve y axis)... if, y1=-4 and y2=-3, then y1 has greater y intercept than does y2). am i correct?.}

2nd-
ok.. say, intercept for line n=5, line p=3, and they passes from point(5,1). so, as i draw on rough paper a1(n)<a2(p); wherea1(n) angle for line n....

now, on -ve y axis, y=-5, p=-3 ... ( my 1st Q is related to this part)-i am considering that this time also y intercept is greater...considering absolute value.

so, when i draw line, a1(n)>a2(p).

..sorry, i am not able to draw fig.

..is considering absolute value is wrong...?? hope i may be..that why i am getting E.

pl confirm...!!! thanks.
When you take y1=-4 and y2=-3, then intercept of y1 is lesser than intercept of y2, since -4 < -3.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion