BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute value inequality

Expert replies
by iLdern » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:35 pm
I just picked this question up from another forum... I want to know if what i'm doing is the correct approach to these kinds of problems. Here goes:

1. Is |x+y|>|x-y|?
(1) |x| > |y|
(2) |x-y| < |x|

My way of approaching this problem:

x or y can either be positive or negative, x will always have the same sign (pos/neg), so it can be canceled out.

1. -x-y>-x+y <=> 0>2y <=> y < 0
2. -x+y > -x-y <=> 2y > 0 <=> y > 0
3. x+y > x-y <=> 2y > 0 <=> y > 0
4. x-y > x+y <=> 0 > 2y <=> y < 0

So, essentially they are asking:is y<0 or y>0 ?

Which would be the same as saying: Does y = 0 ?

Statement 1 doesn't give me much.

Statement 2 tells me (i just cancel out the x's because they will have the same sign anyway)

either y < 0, or y > 0.

Hence B

Am i right or is there another, more efficient, way to solve these kinds of problems?

Thanks for your help
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:02 am
iLdern wrote:I just picked this question up from another forum... I want to know if what i'm doing is the correct approach to these kinds of problems. Here goes:

1. Is |x+y|>|x-y|?
(1) |x| > |y|
(2) |x-y| < |x|

My way of approaching this problem:

x or y can either be positive or negative, x will always have the same sign (pos/neg), so it can be canceled out.

1. -x-y>-x+y <=> 0>2y <=> y < 0
2. -x+y > -x-y <=> 2y > 0 <=> y > 0
3. x+y > x-y <=> 2y > 0 <=> y > 0
4. x-y > x+y <=> 0 > 2y <=> y < 0

So, essentially they are asking:is y<0 or y>0 ?

Which would be the same as saying: Does y = 0 ?

Statement 1 doesn't give me much.

Statement 2 tells me (i just cancel out the x's because they will have the same sign anyway)

either y < 0, or y > 0.

Hence B

Am i right or is there another, more efficient, way to solve these kinds of problems?

Thanks for your help
Faster might be using number properties. Is |x+y|>|x-y|? If one or both variables equals 0, then no (the expressions are equal); likewise, if the signs of x and y are different, then no, |x+y|<|x-y|. If the signs of x and y are the same, then yes, |x+y|>|x-y|. We need to know first 1) whether either number is 0, and then 2) what the signs of the respective nonzero numbers are. If their signs are the same, then |x+y|>|x-y| every time, as adding two numbers of the same sign together takes them further from 0 on the number line. If their signs are different, adding them together brings the total closer to 0, and subtracting them takes them further from 0.

Statement 1 tells us that x is not 0 (there is no way that the absolute value of 0 could be greater than the absolute value of another number) but not much else. INSUFFICIENT
Statement 2 tells us that x is not 0, because no absolute value can be less than 0, and y is not 0 (subtracting y has an effect on x, so y is not 0). Also, if we accept |x-y| < |x| is true, then x and y cannot have opposite signs. As shown above, if they have the same signs and are not 0, |x+y|>|x-y|. SUFFICIENT
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:08 am
For yes-no question, alway pick numbers. if the expression is complicated, we simplify a little then pick number. This question have not comclicated expression. So, we pick number



a, pick x=3, y=2
pick x=3, y=-2

not sufficient

b, pick x=3, y=-2
pick x=3, y=2

sufficient.

for yes-no question, gmat test us the characteristics of number, no more. That is why picking number is fastest
Join the discussion