BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT absolute values

Expert replies
by iamseer » Tue May 04, 2010 8:30 am
If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < (a - b)?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

Source: MGMAT CAT
OA : E

What is the best way to tackle such questions? Is there some technique to handle these kind of absolute value questions better?

Thanks.
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by akhpad » Tue May 04, 2010 8:54 am
iamseer wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < (a - b)?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0
a · |b| =>>>> is it product?

Confirm?
Join the discussion

by iamseer » Tue May 04, 2010 9:11 am
Yes.

Once again the question is:

If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a*|b| < (a - b)?

(1) a < 0

(2) a*b >= 0
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue May 04, 2010 9:33 am
Statement 1:
|a| > |b| and a < 0
Assume a = -5, b = +4 or -4

a*|b| < (a - b)
-5 * 4 < -5 - (-4 or +4)
-20 < -1 or -9 TRUE

Assume a = -1/2, b = +1/3 or -1/3
a*|b| < (a - b)
-1/2 * 1/3 < -1/2 - (-1/3 or +1/3)
-0.166 < -0.834 or -0.166 NOT TRUE

Not Sufficient

Similarly try for others
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Tue May 04, 2010 9:42 am
akhp77 wrote:Statement 1:
|a| > |b| and a < 0
Assume a = -5, b = +4 or -4

a*|b| < (a - b)
-5 * 4 < -5 - (-4 or +4)
-20 < -1 or -9 TRUE

Assume a = -1/2, b = +1/3 or -1/3
a*|b| < (a - b)
-1/2 * 1/3 < -1/2 - (-1/3 or +1/3)
-0.166 < -0.834 or -0.166 NOT TRUE

Not Sufficient

Similarly try for others
Why are we assuming A and B as fractions ? The question requires them to be integers right ? OR am I missing some thing important here ?
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Tue May 04, 2010 11:00 am
iamseer wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < (a - b)?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

Source: MGMAT CAT
OA : E

What is the best way to tackle such questions? Is there some technique to handle these kind of absolute value questions better?

Thanks.
The best way to solve these kind of question is squaring both sides .

Lets look at the question .

We have |a| > |b| --- squaring both sides

a^2 > b ^2 ----> a^2 - b^2 > 0 .

Now we need to know is a · |b| < (a - b)?

Thats a yes / no question . Again square both sides

a^2 b^2 < a^2 - 2ab - b^2

a^2 b^2+ 2ab < a^2 - b^2

so the question becomes is ab(ab+2) < a^2 - b^2 ?

(1) a < 0

Nothing is said about ' b' so insufficient .


(2) ab >= 0

Now if ab = 0 we get

a^2 - b^2 > 0 that is same as what is given in question so nothing new .

But if we do consider ab > 0 . We will get an answer .

So again we can not say for sure .

Insufficient .

Lets combine 1 and 2 .

we know a = negative so b is also negative as ab >0 from 2 .

But it dose not matter if a and b are positive or negative it will lead to the same situation as in statement 2 . Where ab could be equal to zero .

hence this too is not sufficient .

Ans E.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue May 04, 2010 6:31 pm
rockeyb - Yes you are right. a and b are integer
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:06 am
Got this problem wrong. But found an easy approach after the test. Wanted to share with all.

Need to check whether a*|b|<a-b
-> a*|b| -a +b<0
a*(|b|-1)+b <0

stmt1 says a<0.
B can be 0 or <0 or >0
Assume B to be 0,1,-1

Substitute and check if it works in the eqtn a*(|b|-1)+b <0

when b=0,
a<0, hence -a>0
-a+0 >0
-a>0... NO

when b=-1
-1<0..YES

No need to check b=1. one YES and one NO.
hence INSUFF

(2) ab >= 0
a and b can both be negative or a is negative and b=0
These 2 cases We have already covered in stmt1.
hence INSUFF

Combining:
We still have the same failing case.
hence INSUFF

pick E.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:18 am
iamseer wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < (a - b)?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

Source: MGMAT CAT
OA : E

What is the best way to tackle such questions? Is there some technique to handle these kind of absolute value questions better?

Thanks.
Plugging in values works well if you choose wisely. To be efficient, search for values that satisfy both statements, recognizing how the problem is restricted -- and how it isn't. Here's what would go through my head as I read through the problem:

a and b are integers. Ok, no decimals.
|a| > |b|. Ok, a has to be farther from 0 than b.
Looking at statement 1: a<0. Ok, only negative values for a.
Looking ahead to statement 2: ab>=0. Ok, to satisfy both statements, b must be negative or 0.

So let's try a = -2, b = -1, and b=0. These values satisfy all the conditions.

If a = -2 and b = -1:
Is a · |b| < (a - b)?
-2 * |-1| < (-2 - (-1))
-2 < -1 Yes.

If a = -2 and b=0:
Is a · |b| < (a - b)?
-2 · |0| < (-2 - 0)
0 < -2 No.

Since the answer can be both yes and no, and since we've chosen values that satisfy both statements, the correct answer is E.

By recognizing how the problem is restricted -- and how it isn't -- and by choosing values that satisfy both statements, we make the process much more efficient.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion