Appositive Usage - General Question

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

Appositive Usage - General Question

by uwhusky » Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:27 am
It is my understanding that appositive should modify the nearest noun, but at the same time, I see examples in the OG in which appositive modifies the head of the of-preposition instead of the object noun of the preposition. My question is, can an appositive modify both the object of an of-preposition and the head noun of a of-preposition? Is this one of those things that aren't set in stone?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:6 members

by niksworth » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:00 pm
Indeed an appositive generally modifies the noun which it immediately follows. But this is not set in stone. It can also modify the noun ahead of the preposition instead of the object of preposition.

E.g. - Tashonda's goal in life, to become an occupational therapist, is within her grasp this year, at last. - Here the appositive to become an occupational therapist is modifying goal, the noun ahead of the preposition in [See how I used an appositive in the last sentence in its conventional sense? :D ]

What it actually modifies has to come out of the sentence in focus.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:13 pm
Alright, so in some cases, you wouldn't necessarily eliminate an answer because an appositive doesn't appear to be modifying the object of the preposition, as long as it could be modifying the head noun of the preposition?

Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:6 members

by niksworth » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:17 pm
uwhusky wrote:Alright, so in some cases, you wouldn't necessarily eliminate an answer because an appositive doesn't appear to be modifying the object of the preposition, as long as it could be modifying the head noun of the preposition?
AND as long as it conveyed proper sense, yes I wouldn't.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:56 pm
Thanks for the invite to join in! My take:

1) The nice thing about the GMAT is that you don't have to thoroughly understand all the rules of English (otherwise I'd certainly be out of a job), but rather just the application of what's tested. I think niksworth's point is a phenomenal one - "as long as it conveyed proper sense". If the modifier is logical in what it modifies, that's a much better general-case rule than trying to build an if-then flowchart that accounts for every case.

2) When a modifier includes a modifier, the appositive PHRASE needs to modify the word that comes next to it, but the words don't necessarily have to "touch":

The most popular girl in school, Marisa is captain of the softball team.

"in school" is kind of a necessary modifier...without it it's pretty nebulous how popular Marisa is (most popular in the world?). But using it pretty much dictates that it's going to separate "girl" from "Marisa". That's okay...the phrase is directly adjacent to her, so we know that it modifies her.

Again, the nice thing with the GMAT is that you always have choices to make between multiple options, so you don't have to know exactly what's right as long as you can recognize what's wrong. When in doubt, see if you can fall back on logic (does it make sense?) and that can be your guide through unclear situations.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.

• Page 1 of 1