BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is picking numbers the quickiest approach here?

Expert replies
by mepinoargote » Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:56 pm
If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the number or representatives of district 1 and district 2 respectively, the ratio of the population to the number of representatives is greater for which of the two districts??

(1) p1>p2
(2) r2<r1

Is easy and very quick to conclude (1) and (2) are insufficient, but what´s the quickiest approach to test (1) and (2) together? picking numbers?

p1/r1 < p2/r2 or p1/r1 > p2/r2 ???

In this particular question we know p1, p2, r1 and r2 are > 0 since they are populations and representatives, but what if a question gives you no restrictions, and p1/r1, p2/r2 could be any number (possitive, negative, fraction, decimal, etc.)

how can we test this quicky? is pícking numbers the best strategy?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by niksworth » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:13 pm
It is fairly basic that If p1>p2 and r1>r2, then p1/r1 is not necessarily greater than or less than p2/r2. Hence the answer is E. One need not pick numbers for that.

The danger in picking numbers is that you may choose a wrong set of numbers a get the wrong result.
E.g. if you choose p1 = 100, p2 = 50, r1 = 20 and r2 = 5 then p1/r1 < p2/r2.
However, if p1 = 100, p2 = 50, r1 = 20, r2 = 15 then p1/r1 > p2/r2.

Picking numbers may help if you have a hunch of what the answer might be and you want to confirm it. For e.g. in this question, if you feel that the given information is not sufficient but are not sure, a quick check with numbers like those used above may help to clarify.

I think that, in general, picking numbers help in negation more than in assertion.
Join the discussion

by mepinoargote » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:17 pm
actually the official answer is C, i made the same mistake as you and assumed more information was needed.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:34 pm
mepinoargote wrote:actually the official answer is C, i made the same mistake as you and assumed more information was needed.
Then clearly, the OA is wrong. We cannot conclusively say about the ratios unless there is some other information.

2 questions -
1) Is there any explanation provided?
2) What is the source?
Join the discussion

by mepinoargote » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:42 pm
type error, sorry, statement (2) is r2>r1. question is from og 12 DS # 38.
Join the discussion

by Maciek » Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:43 pm
Hi all!

(1) & (2)
the quickest way to check whether both statements are sufficient is:
p1 > p2, for example p1 = 5p2
r2>r1, for example r1 = 0.5r2
p1/r1 = 5p2/(0.5r2) = 10*p2/r2
p1/r1 > p2/r2

Statements 1 and 2 both are sufficient.

check how to analyze a GMATPrep Data Sufficiency Question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2010/03/ ... y-question

Hope it helps!
Best,
Maciek
"There is no greater wealth in a nation than that of being made up of learned citizens." Pope John Paul II

if you have any questions, send me a private message!

should you find this post useful, please click on "thanks" button :)
Join the discussion