Quick high school maths refresher -
Sum of all angles of a triangle equals 180 degrees. -------- (A)
Supplementary angles on a line sum to 180 degrees. ------ (B)
Now in the question above, We need PRS - PQR,
Statement 1:
QPR = 30
From A above - QPR + PQR + PRQ = 180
This implies PQR + PRQ = 150
or, PRQ = 180 - PQR ---------(C)
Also PRQ and PRS are supplementary. So from B above, PRQ + PRS = 180
Substituting for PRQ from C, 180 - PQR + PRS = 150
or, PRS - PQR = 30.
Thus 1 is sufficient.
Statement 2:
PQR + PRQ = 150
or, PRQ = 180 - PQR ---------(D)
Also PRQ and PRS are supplementary. So from B above, PRQ + PRS = 180
Substituting for PRQ from C, 180 - PQR + PRS = 150
or, PRS - PQR = 30.
Thus 2 is sufficient.
Since both statements alone are sufficient, answer is D.
GMAT Prep Math question - help!
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Quantitative Reasoning |
- neerajkumar1_1
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:00 am
- Thanked: 24 times
- Followed by:2 members
one approach u can always remember
whenever u r stuck... and dont know how to proceed with the problem...
try picking numbers...
statement 1:
in your figure take <RPS = 30
therefore <PRS = 180 - (90 + 30) = 60
since <RPS = 30 , <QPS = 30 + 30 = 60
therefore <PQR = 180 - (90 + 60) = 30
Now <PRS - <PQR = 30
as soon as u get this answer it should hit u that the answer will be the same no matter what number u start with...
u can further try with 20 or something...
statement 2 says essentially the same thing as statement 1...
so IMO: D
Hope it Helps...
whenever u r stuck... and dont know how to proceed with the problem...
try picking numbers...
statement 1:
in your figure take <RPS = 30
therefore <PRS = 180 - (90 + 30) = 60
since <RPS = 30 , <QPS = 30 + 30 = 60
therefore <PQR = 180 - (90 + 60) = 30
Now <PRS - <PQR = 30
as soon as u get this answer it should hit u that the answer will be the same no matter what number u start with...
u can further try with 20 or something...
statement 2 says essentially the same thing as statement 1...
so IMO: D
Hope it Helps...


















