BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

How to solve this type of question??

Expert replies
by alivapriyada » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:54 am
When a certain tree was first planted,it was 4 feet tall,and the height of the tree increased by a constant amount each year for the next 6 years.At the end of the 6th year,the tree was 1/5 taller than it was at the end of the 4th year.By how many feet did the height of the tree increases each year?

(1) 3/10
(2) 2/5
(3) 1/2
(4) 2/3
(5) 6/5

OA is (4)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kvcpk » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:10 pm
alivapriyada wrote:When a certain tree was first planted,it was 4 feet tall,and the height of the tree increased by a constant amount each year for the next 6 years.At the end of the 6th year,the tree was 1/5 taller than it was at the end of the 4th year.By how many feet did the height of the tree increases each year?

(1) 3/10
(2) 2/5
(3) 1/2
(4) 2/3
(5) 6/5

OA is (4)
Let the tree grow by k amount each year.
At the end of first year height = 4+k
At the end of second year -= 4+2k
third year = 4+3k
fourth = 4+4k
fifth = 4+5k
sixth = 4+6k

Now, 4+6k - (4+4k) = (4+4k)*1/5
10k = 4+4k
k = 4/6 = 2/3

hope this helps
Join the discussion

by indiantiger » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:44 pm
time period--->1-------------2--------3---------4---------5---------6
initial height =4
height increase per year = x
height---------(4+x)-----(4+2x)---(4+3x)---(4+4x)--(4+5x)----(4+6x)

now given to us
=>(4+4x)+(4+4x)/5 = 4+6x
=>24x+24 = 20 + 30x
=>4 = 6x
=>x = 2/3 (answer)
"Single Malt is better than Blended"
Join the discussion

by aarati » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:41 pm
kvcpk wrote:
alivapriyada wrote:When a certain tree was first planted,it was 4 feet tall,and the height of the tree increased by a constant amount each year for the next 6 years.At the end of the 6th year,the tree was 1/5 taller than it was at the end of the 4th year.By how many feet did the height of the tree increases each year?

(1) 3/10
(2) 2/5
(3) 1/2
(4) 2/3
(5) 6/5

OA is (4)
Let the tree grow by k amount each year.
At the end of first year height = 4+k
At the end of second year -= 4+2k
third year = 4+3k
fourth = 4+4k
fifth = 4+5k
sixth = 4+6k

Now, 4+6k - (4+4k) = (4+4k)*1/5
10k = 4+4k
k = 4/6 = 2/3

hope this helps
thank you very much...... is there any another way to solve.......
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:06 pm
aarati wrote: thank you very much...... is there any another way to solve.......
I think this is the easy approach aarati.

Another approach would be:

Since tree grew by 1/5 than 4th year, tree height in sixth year would be (1+1/5) = 6/5 times the height at fourth year.

4+6H = 6/5(4+4H)
Hence H = 2/3

This turns out ot be paraphrased version of the above method.

So it doesnt matter. You can apply whichever is comfortable for you.
Join the discussion

by sdotcruz » Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:57 am
I was thrown off by this question. The reason i was that I thought the tree was growing exponentially. Did the words "Constant Amount" signal that it was increasing by the same amount each year? What words would signal that the object is growing exponentially?
Join the discussion

by Arcane66 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 12:47 pm
sdotcruz wrote:I was thrown off by this question. The reason i was that I thought the tree was growing exponentially. Did the words "Constant Amount" signal that it was increasing by the same amount each year? What words would signal that the object is growing exponentially?
I did this problem the same way kvcpk's second post illustrates. I think this reasoning is sound. A constant amount means it is growing by the same amount, in this case, for six straight years. Think of it like you're going to a bar and drinking five shots every night. This is a constant amount of alcohol every night for a period of time. The number or amount does not change. It would say it is growing exponentially. A good example of exponential growth is when you have a number that is being raised to a certain power each time it grows. This is not the case with this problem.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:46 pm
alivapriyada wrote:When a certain tree was first planted,it was 4 feet tall,and the height of the tree increased by a constant amount each year for the next 6 years.At the end of the 6th year,the tree was 1/5 taller than it was at the end of the 4th year.By how many feet did the height of the tree increases each year?

(1) 3/10
(2) 2/5
(3) 1/2
(4) 2/3
(5) 6/5
We can also solve this problem by backsolving, i.e. working with the choices.

Generally when we backsolve we start with either (2) or (4). Let's start with (4) here.

If the tree is growing by 2/3 of a foot per year, then its height is:

yr 0: 4 feet
yr 1: 4 2/3
yr 2: 5 1/3
yr 3: 6
yr 4: 6 2/3
yr 5: 7 1/3
yr 6: 8

Is 8 (year 6 height) 1/5th greater than 6 2/3 (hear 4 height)?

Converting to thirds:

Is 24/3 1/5th greater than 20/3?

(24/3)/(20/3) = 24/20 = 6/5 = 1 1/5

Yes! Therefore, (4) is the correct answer.

If (4) gave us a result less than 1 1/5, then we'd need a bigger number; if (4) gave us a result greater than 1 1/5, then we'd need a smaller number.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by josemaus » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:29 pm
When I first read this question, I interpreted the phrase "1/5 taller" to mean 6th year - 4th year = 1/5; it seems more appropriate if the phrasing were, "4th year was 1/5 as tall". Regardless of the phrasing, I tried to solve the question using a different method; however, was unable to get to the desired answer.

Since a 4 foot tree grows at a constant rate, the tree should grow as follows:
0: 4
1: 4f (f being the growth)
2: 4f^2
...
6: 4f^6

So solve you set up the equation 4f^6 = 4f^4*(6/5). I cannot get f to equal 2/3. What am I doing wrong???!!!!
Join the discussion

by josemaus » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:42 pm
As a follow-up, this is where my logic is coming from:

OG 12 #81
Bacteria Table
Time Amount

1pm 10g
4pm x grams
7pm 14.4 g

Data for a certain biology experiment are given in the table above. If the amount of bacteria present increased by the same factor during each of the two 3-hour periods shown, how many grams of bacteria were present at 4pm?

a) 12.0
b) 12.1
c) 12.2
d) 12.3
e) 12.4

OA: A

The way to solve this is 1st 3-hour period 10*f, and 2nd 3-hour period 10*f^2, not by doing 10 + x and 10 + 2x.
Join the discussion