BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Speed Dist DS

Expert replies
by Skywalker » Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:36 pm
3) X , Y and Z shared a 1500 mile drive. Which of the 3 drove the greatest distance on the trip ?

i) X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.
ii) Z drove for 9 hours at an avg rate of 50 miles per hour.

Note: How can we quickly calculate the details in option i) above, is what I am looking for. The OA is C I blv while I opted for E.
StAy HuNgry sTay fOOlisH
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by anticipation » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:44 am
The correct answer indeed is E. Please check the source of OA.

1) We know that T and T+1 is time taken by Y and X respectively
And S and S-5 is the speed of Y and X

Insufficient
2) Z covered 450

450< 1500/3
So Insufficient

Combining both
(T+T+1)*(S+S-5)=1050

We cant solve this. So E.

If someone knows how to solve it combining both, they dont need an MBA, they deserve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:01 am
Hmm...... maybe I am wrong but C kind of makes sense....

Which of the 3 drove the greatest distance on the trip ?

i) X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

So this one is insufficient.

ii) Z drove for 9 hours at an avg rate of 50 miles per hour.

So Z drove for 450mph. We have 1050 mph to go. So CLEARLY Z did not drive the most. if we divide 1050/2 = 525. So even if x and Y drove the same, they still covered more distance than Z. So Z is out of the question.

But this one is also insufficient to say who drove the most.


Together
Z is out of the question. So we are left with X and Y

Notice that the question says X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

X drove an hour more than Y but at an AVERAGE speed of 5mph less than Y.

So logically, Y covered more distance than X because Y's AVG speed was higher.

To do this one algebraically, lets plug in values for y and x:

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

y1= 20mph (avg rate)
y2 = 5 hours

20x5=100 miles

x1 = 15mph (avg rate 5 less than y)
x2 = 6

15x6=90 miles

so y drove more than x. therefore, y drove the most

i hope this makes sense.......:D
Last edited by Gurpinder on Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:09 am
Gurpinder,

Underneath the section titled Together, your third statement is incorrect. In the second sentence, you correctly reiterated that X drove 1 hour longer than Y, but the third statement reverses that, saying that X drove 1 hour less than Y.

This will most certainly impact the answer...

Gurpinder wrote:Hmm...... maybe I am wrong but C kind of makes sense....

Which of the 3 drove the greatest distance on the trip ?

i) X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

So this one is insufficient.

ii) Z drove for 9 hours at an avg rate of 50 miles per hour.

So Z drove for 450mph. We have 1050 mph to go. So CLEARLY Z did not drive the most. if we divide 1050/2 = 525. So even if x and Y drove the same, they still covered more distance than Z. So Z is out of the question.

But this one is also insufficient to say who drove the most.


Together
Z is out of the question. So we are left with X and Y

Notice that the question says X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

X drove an hour less than Y but at an AVERAGE speed of 5mph less than Y.

So logically, Y covered more distance than X because Y's AVG speed was higher.

To do this one algebraically, lets plug in values for y and x:

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

y1= 20mph (avg rate)
y2 = 5 hours

20x5=100 miles

x1 = 15mph (avg rate 5 less than y)
x2 = 6

15x6=90 miles

so y drove more than x. therefore, y drove the most

i hope this makes sense.......:D
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:18 am
tomada wrote:Gurpinder,

Underneath the section titled Together, your third statement is incorrect. In the second sentence, you correctly reiterated that X drove 1 hour longer than Y, but the third statement reverses that, saying that X drove 1 hour less than Y.

This will most certainly impact the answer...

Gurpinder wrote:Hmm...... maybe I am wrong but C kind of makes sense....

Which of the 3 drove the greatest distance on the trip ?

i) X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

So this one is insufficient.

ii) Z drove for 9 hours at an avg rate of 50 miles per hour.

So Z drove for 450mph. We have 1050 mph to go. So CLEARLY Z did not drive the most. if we divide 1050/2 = 525. So even if x and Y drove the same, they still covered more distance than Z. So Z is out of the question.

But this one is also insufficient to say who drove the most.


Together
Z is out of the question. So we are left with X and Y

Notice that the question says X drove 1 hour longer than Y but at an avg rate of 5 miles per hour less than Y.

X drove an hour less than Y but at an AVERAGE speed of 5mph less than Y.

So logically, Y covered more distance than X because Y's AVG speed was higher.

To do this one algebraically, lets plug in values for y and x:

distance for x: (y1-5)(y2+1) distance for y: (x1+5)(x2-1) ----> (var1 = rate, var2 = time)

y1= 20mph (avg rate)
y2 = 5 hours

20x5=100 miles

x1 = 15mph (avg rate 5 less than y)
x2 = 6

15x6=90 miles

so y drove more than x. therefore, y drove the most

i hope this makes sense.......:D
ahh sorry I got confused in all that jargon.

thanks
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion