CR confusion

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:15 am
Location: India
Thanked: 13 times

CR confusion

by gauravgundal » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:53 pm
In most earthquakes the Earth's crust cracks like porcelain. Stress builds up until a fracture forms at a depth of a few kilometers and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth's mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths?
That such deep events do occur has been accepted only since 1927, when the seismologist Kiyoo Wadati convincingly demonstrated their existence. Instead of comparing the arrival times of seismic waves at different locations, as earlier researchers had done. Wadati relied on a time difference between the arrival of primary (P) waves and the slower secondary (S) waves. Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or rupture point.
For most earthquakes, Wadati discovered, the interval was quite short near the epicenter, the point on the surface where shaking is strongest. For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter. Wadati saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. Most earthquakes had a small area of intense shaking, which weakened rapidly with increasing distance from the epicenter, but others were characterized by a lower peak intensity, felt over a broader area. Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested two kinds of earthquakes: the more common shallow events, in which the focus lay just under the epicenter, and deep events, with a focus several hundred kilometers down.
The question remained: how can such quakes occur, given that mantle rock at a depth of more than 50 kilometers is too ductile to store enough stress to fracture? Wadati's work suggested that deep events occur in areas (now called Wadati-Benioff zones) where one crustal plate is forced under another and descends into the mantle. The descending rock is substantially cooler than the surrounding mantle and hence is less ductile and much more liable to fracture.
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) demonstrating why the methods of early seismologists were flawed
(B) arguing that deep events are poorly understood and deserve further study
(C) defending a revolutionary theory about the causes of earthquakes and methods of predicting them
(D) discussing evidence for the existence of deep events and the conditions that allow them to occur
(E) comparing the effects of shallow events with those of deep events

How C can be the answer why not D? explain with reason


3. It can be inferred from the passage that if the S waves from an earthquake arrive at a given location long after the P waves, which of the following must be true?
(A) The earthquake was a deep event.
(B) The earthquake was a shallow event.
(C) The earthquake focus was distant.
(D) The earthquake focus was nearby.
(E) The earthquake had a low peak intensity.

three possible answers A,C and E .Why A is correct one .
The reason may be that (Earthquake focus was distant + EQ has a low peak intensity )-> Deep event
Please explain this.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:03 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by max37274 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:51 pm
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) demonstrating why the methods of early seismologists were flawed
(B) arguing that deep events are poorly understood and deserve further study
(C) defending a revolutionary theory about the causes of earthquakes and methods of predicting them
"methods of predicting have not been discussed"; Also "causes of earthquakes in general (only deep by the theory) has not been discussed"-out of scope
(D) discussing evidence for the existence of deep events and the conditions that allow them to occur
sounds correct answer to me
(E) comparing the effects of shallow events with those of deep events


3. It can be inferred from the passage that if the S waves from an earthquake arrive at a given location long after the P waves, which of the following must be true?
(A) The earthquake was a deep event.
(B) The earthquake was a shallow event.
(C) The earthquake focus was distant.
vague term. focus is focus; exact geographic location not discussed; circumference is large
(D) The earthquake focus was nearby.
(E) The earthquake had a low peak intensity.
"para says LOWER peak intensity not the same as LOW as lets say lower when compared to shallow earth quake but not in intensity on a standalone basis"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:56 pm
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:720

by singhag » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:06 am
I got all the following question for the same passage wrong...this is very tough for me. Please post your answer with some explanation.

The author's explanation of how deep events
occur would be most weakened if which of
the following were discovered to be true?
A. Deep events are far less common than
shallow events.
B. Deep events occur in places other than
where crustal plates meet.
C. Mantle rock is more ductile at a depth of
several hundred kilometers than it is
at 50 kilometers.
D. The speeds of both P and S waves are
slightly greater than previously thought.
E. Below 650 kilometers earthquakes cease
to occur.
Answer:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31.
information presented in the passage suggests
that, compared with seismic activity
at the epicenter of a shallow event, seismic
activity at the epicenter of a deep event is
characterized by
A. shorter P-S intervals and higher peak
intensity
B. shorter P-S intervals and lower peak
intensity
C. longer P-S intervals and similar peak
intensity
D. longer P-S intervals and higher peak
intensity
E. longer P-S intervals and lower peak
intensity.
Answer:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32.
The passage supports which of the following
Statements about the relationship between the
epicenter and the focus of an earthquake?
(A)P waves originate at the focus and
S waves originate at the epicenter.
(B) In deep events the epicenter and the
focus are reversed.
(C) In shallow events the epicenter and the
focus coincide
(D)In both deep and shallow events the
Focus lies beneath the epicenter
(E) The epicenter is in the crust, whereas
the focus is in the mantle.
Answer:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
33.
The passage suggests that which of the
following must take place in order for any
earthquake to occur?
1.Stress must build up.
2.Cool rock must descend
into the mantle.
3.A fracture must occur
(A)1 only
(B) 2 only
(C) 3 only
(D)1 and 3 only
(E) 1, 2, and 3
answer:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:53 am
[spoiler]1 (D) 3 (C) [/spoiler] know both are wrong but not these 4

30 B 31 D 32 E 33 D

9 mins but getting it wrong is worse.

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by adi_800 » Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:27 pm
Correct answer to the first question has to be D...
It can not be C..
I too got D when I solved...
Got 2 wrong out of a total of 9 questions with a time of 14 minutes...