BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

300 Questions: Prime

Expert replies
by ashish2104 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:13 am
If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
A) x is evenly divisible by exactly two positive integers.
B) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.

Ans given is C, but i think B is sufficient. Only number 2 has its sum of 2 distinct factors odd.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sanju09 » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:20 am
ashish2104 wrote:If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
A) x is evenly divisible by exactly two positive integers.
B) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.

Ans given is C, but i think B is sufficient. Only number 2 has its sum of 2 distinct factors odd.
B is the right answer to me too. Never worry, if an integer greater than 1 has sum of any two distinct positive factors of it as odd, it cannot have more than two factors plus it got to be even too. This x is just [spoiler]2.

B
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by alcatch » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:01 am
No, you need to read the second statement on its own - if the number is a multiple of two and another odd factor, eg 3, then 1+6 and 2+3 are odd. So it could be 2 or 6. Also, 5 and 2 multiply to make 10; add to make 7; 10 and 1 make 11... get the picture?

C is good.
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:27 am
ashish2104 wrote:If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
A) x is evenly divisible by exactly two positive integers.
B) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.
Actually, the answer (C) makes sense.

Stmt 1:
This is insufficient because this is true for any prime number.

Stmt 2:
The sum of divisors of ANY odd number will be even. Therefore, if the sum is Odd, we can only consider even numbers.

So lets say that X is 2. 2 is divisible by 2,1 which = 3. This works for Stmt 2.
But lets say that X is 4. 4 is divisible by 4,1 which = 5. This is also an ODD number.

Therefore Stmt 2 is insufficient by itself.

Together.
X is a prime number. And 2 is the only prime number for which the sum of its divisors = odd. The rest are all even.

I hope this helps!
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by vijaynaik » Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:16 pm
@Gurpinder, in your example 4 not only has 1,4 but also has 2.

2nd statement says sum of any 2 distinct factors: so for 4 4+2 is not odd similarly for 5,6..

So i think B should be correct .
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:27 pm
B can't be correct.

If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
2) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.

x could be anything.

Let's use 10, factors of 10 are 1, 2, 5, 10; 1 + 2 = 3.

Let's try 12, factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12; 1 + 6 = 7.

So 2) says that x could be either 10 or 12, and neither of them is 2.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:18 am
uwhusky wrote:B can't be correct.

If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
2) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.

x could be anything.

Let's use 10, factors of 10 are 1, 2, 5, 10; 1 + 2 = 3.

Let's try 12, factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12; 1 + 6 = 7.

So 2) says that x could be either 10 or 12, and neither of them is 2.

Please read Statement 2 without falling in to the trap there. It reads sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd; any two means any two. If you try any number other than 2, you will find the core condition as violated.

First try x for some prime NOT 2, it got to be an odd now, the only and other factor, 1, is already odd. The sum cannot be odd. Hence the author is definitely not calling x as an odd prime.

Next try any composite you please and see how the core condition is violated.

Try 10, factors being 1, 2, 5, 10; since any two means any two, why shouldn't we try 2 + 10 = EVEN to prove the core condition as violated. Or try 12, factors being 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12; since any two means any two, why shouldn't we try 2 + 4 = EVEN to prove the core condition as violated again. You can keep trying if you cannot admit the fact that to any composite, the factors are either all ODD or at least two EVEN.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:29 am
@Sanju,

I am with u...B is very much sufficient.. well explained Sanju....
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:23 am
sanju09 wrote:
uwhusky wrote:B can't be correct.

If the integer x is greater than 1, does x = 2?
2) The sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd.

x could be anything.

Let's use 10, factors of 10 are 1, 2, 5, 10; 1 + 2 = 3.

Let's try 12, factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12; 1 + 6 = 7.

So 2) says that x could be either 10 or 12, and neither of them is 2.

Please read Statement 2 without falling in to the trap there. It reads sum of any two distinct positive factors of x is odd; any two means any two. If you try any number other than 2, you will find the core condition as violated.

First try x for some prime NOT 2, it got to be an odd now, the only and other factor, 1, is already odd. The sum cannot be odd. Hence the author is definitely not calling x as an odd prime.

Next try any composite you please and see how the core condition is violated.

Try 10, factors being 1, 2, 5, 10; since any two means any two, why shouldn't we try 2 + 10 = EVEN to prove the core condition as violated. Or try 12, factors being 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12; since any two means any two, why shouldn't we try 2 + 4 = EVEN to prove the core condition as violated again. You can keep trying if you cannot admit the fact that to any composite, the factors are either all ODD or at least two EVEN.
You're right, the key word here is "any".
Join the discussion