BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Permutation & Combination

Expert replies
by mba1986 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:53 am
A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights for photograph by placing
them in two rows of three so that each person in the first row is standing in front of
someone in the second row. The heights of the people within each row must increase
from left to right, and each person in the second row must be taller than the person
standing in front of him or her. How many such arrangements of the 6 people are
possible?
A. 5
B. 6
C. 9
D. 24
E. 36

Dont have the answer sorry...
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kvcpk » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:15 am
Let the heights be 1,2,3,4,5,6
C D 6
1 A B
This should be the arrangement.
Hence we are left with 4 unknown psitions A,B,C,D corresponding to 2,3,4,5 (not in the same order)

Now, for D:
D>A and D>C
Hence D should be greater than atleast 2 elements out of 2,3,4,5
Which means D can be 4 or 5

Now, for C,
C< D
So C can be 2 or 3 or 4

When D = 4, C can be 2 or 3 -> 2 ways
When D = 5, C can take 2 or 3 or 4. -> 3 ways

Hence total 5 ways.

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by likithae » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:03 am
kvcpk wrote:Let the heights be 1,2,3,4,5,6
C D 6
1 A B
This should be the arrangement.
Hence we are left with 4 unknown psitions A,B,C,D corresponding to 2,3,4,5 (not in the same order)

Now, for D:
D>A and D>C
Hence D should be greater than atleast 2 elements out of 2,3,4,5
Which means D can be 4 or 5

Now, for C,
C< D
So C can be 2 or 3 or 4

When D = 4, C can be 2 or 3 -> 2 ways
When D = 5, C can take 2 or 3 or 4. -> 3 ways

Hence total 5 ways.

your assumption is correct ,but will explaining it is little bit confusing please explain me clearly ...........in simple method .........
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:17 am
likithae wrote: your assumption is correct ,but will explaining it is little bit confusing please explain me clearly ...........in simple method .........
Well, this problem is a bit difficult to explain. I found this link which has a detailed solution.
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/per ... -t602.html

Check this link and post back if you still have any queries.

Cheers!!
Join the discussion

by sheelanadh » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:18 am
kvcpk wrote:
likithae wrote: your assumption is correct ,but will explaining it is little bit confusing please explain me clearly ...........in simple method .........
Well, this problem is a bit difficult to explain. I found this link which has a detailed solution.
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/per ... -t602.html

Check this link and post back if you still have any queries.

Cheers!!

thanks........... i too came across these problem... by sending a link now i can understood clearly........
Join the discussion