BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

'soaring television' SC problem

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by jan08 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:14 am
my take is B, here is why:

A. a greater proportion than it was: Negate this choice as it is singular and costs is plural
B. a greater proportion than: seems logical, lets keep this as an option
C. a greater proportion than they have been: need simple past here, negated
D. which is greater than was so: what is which referring to? and so is not idiomatic
E. which is greater than it has been: problem with which..it is singular..need simple past

by POE, B is the choice...OA please?
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:34 pm
The answer is B.

A -- it's wrong, but not because costs is plural. 'it' in the phrase refers to the proportion of television costs. Therefore the problem is not agreement, but redundance since the pronoun unnecessarily refers back to a word in the sentence.

B -- it's correct because it eliminates the redundance issue in A.

C-- wrong verb tense

D -- 'which' is wrong

E-- problem with which and wrong verb tense
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

by jan08 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:38 pm
Thanks Danielle..looks like i am coming close :)
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:54 pm
you totally are -- keep it up!
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1