BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Q134 in OG 11th Edition

Expert replies
by globalcitizen » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:27 pm
If m and n are positive integers, is sqrt(n-m) an integer?
1) n>m+15
2) n=m(m+1)

Answer is B

This is a fairly straightforward question however, I find that I am having a lot of issues with DS because I "overthink" things or assume too much. My question here is, can we assume that sqrt(m^2)=m means that m is an integer? I got this answer for statement 2 but thought that m^2 could still mean that m may be a fraction.

Unless otherwise stated, are we supposed to assume that sqrt(m^2)=m always means that m will be an integer? I hope I make sense here.

Any words of advice would be greatly appreciated.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sk818020 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:13 pm
The answer states that both n and m are positive integers.

(1) n>m+15

This simply tells us that m>1 and n>16. n could be 30 and m could be 5 and the square of their difference would be an integer( sqrt(25)=5) or n could equal 31 and m could equal 5 and the square root of there difference could not be an integer (sqrt(26) is not an integer). So (1) in sufficient.

(2) n=m(m+1)

m(m+1)=m^2+m

So substituting n in n-m,

n-m = (m^2+m)-m = m^2+m-m = m^2

So,

sqrt(m^2)=m, and

m is an integer so, B sufficient.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:31 pm
Unless otherwise stated, are we supposed to assume that sqrt(m^2)=m always means that m will be an integer? I hope I make sense here.
sqrt(m^2) = m
The above equation is always true. One way of seeing this is to understand that sqrt(x) is the same as x^(1/2). So, sqrt(m^2) = (m^2)^1/2. When we have an exponent in the bracket and outside of the bracket, we multiply the exponents (powers rule). So, sqrt(m^2) = m ALWAYS.

But that doesn't necessarily mean that m is an integer value. We can conclude that sqrt(m^2) is an integer only if we already know that m itself is an integer.

As Jared points out, we are told that m and n are both integers. When we look at the statements, we must include this information in our analysis (we must never ignore information from the question stem itself).

(1) is clearly insufficient and if the algebra doesn't jump out to you, then the easiest way to see that (2) is sufficient is to pick some numbers, and to be organized in your scratchwork. Let's do that here:

2) n=m(m+1)

Let m = 1. Then n = 1*2 = 2. Is sqrt(2-1) an integer? Yes.

Let m = 2. Then, n = 2*3 =6. Is sqrt(6-2) an integer? Yes.

Let m = 3. Then, n = 3*4 = 12. Is sqrt(12-3) an integer? Yes.

By now we've convinced ourselves that (2) will always yield an integer value.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by globalcitizen » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:54 am
Thank you very much for your responses and for making me realize that I completely overlooked the information given in the question stem! This is something I find myself doing all too frequently. I'm going to try talking out loud in my head (if that makes any sense) to help me better focus...

Thanks again for the help!
Join the discussion