BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

digit a of x

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:41 am
If x is a two digit number (so that x = b a, with b and a as digits), what is the units' digit a of x?

(1)The number 3 x is a three digit number whose units' digit is a.

(2)The digit a is less than 7.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by albatross86 » Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:14 am
There is a conceptual way to do this problem which is difficult to explain, but it is simply by observing the possibilities of a that satisfy this condition in your head. That should be easy for some, but anyway here's an algebraic explanation.

The number x can be expressed as 10b + a

1. 3*(10b + a)
= 30b + 3a

The units digit is therefore "3a" but truncated to its own units digit

You can confirm this with an example: 24*3 = 72 ... 4*3 = 12... so units digit of 24*3 = 2 which is the truncated units digit of 12, i.e. 12 - 10

Another example 98*3 = 294 ... 8*3 = 24 so units digit of 98*3 = 4 which is truncated units digit of 24 i.e. 24 - 20

Sometimes you won''t need to truncate, like 22 * 3 = 66, where the units digit is simply 2*3 = 6

So, either 3a = a => a = 0
OR 3a - 10 = a => a = 5
OR 3a - 20 = a => a = 10 ... but a is a digit so it cannot be greater than 9.

So a could be 0 or 5.

INSUFFICIENT

2. a < 7

Could be anything from 0 to 6

INSUFFICIENT

Both 1 and 2:

Could be 0 or 5.

INSUFFICIENT

Pick E.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:37 am
So my approach here is to pick numbers and disprove ....

stmt 1 - say x = 31, 41 it works but x could also be 72, 82 ....... hence stmt 1 does not suffice

stmt 2 - does not suffice as shown above.

Combined not enough

Hence E
Join the discussion

by albatross86 » Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:39 am
mj78ind wrote:So my approach here is to pick numbers and disprove ....

stmt 1 - say x = 31, 41 it works but x could also be 72, 82 ....... hence stmt 1 does not suffice

stmt 2 - does not suffice as shown above.

Combined not enough

Hence E
Hi, could you please explain how those examples you've given for statement 1 work?

As far as I can see, only numbers with 0 or 5 in the units digit would work.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:03 am
I am not sure whether my approach is correct.

Let x=10b+a

From stmt1,

3x is a 3 digits number(let pqr)

100p+10q+r=3x=30b+3a

100p+10q+r=30b+3a

r=a

-->100p+10q+a=30b+3a

2a=100p+10q-30b

a=50p+5q-15b

a/5=10p+q-3b

The equation will be satisified only if a is divisible by 5.Since a is a digit it can be 0 or 5 only.

a=0 or 5

Insufficient.

From stmt2,

a can be any no from 0 to 6.Insufficient.

Combining,

Again a can be 0 or 5.

Insufficient.

Hence E
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:07 am
sanju09 wrote:If x is a two digit number (so that x = b a, with b and a as digits), what is the units' digit a of x?

(1)The number 3 x is a three digit number whose units' digit is a.

(2)The digit a is less than 7.
Unit digits range from 0 -9

St 1:

Multiply the unit digit(a) by 3 and see which one exactly matches with" a" in its unit's place.

a * 3= a( expected)
0 *3 = 0 (YES)
1*3= 3(NO)
2*3=6 (NO)
3*3=9 (NO)
4*3=2 (NO)
5*3=5 YES
6*3=8 (NO)
7*3 =1(NO)
8*3 =4 (NO)
9*3 =7 (NO)


a can be 0 or 5.. Insifficient

ST 2: again no much of any use.

combining..Not really of any use

Sp pick E
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Fri Jul 02, 2010 7:20 am
albatross86 wrote:
mj78ind wrote:So my approach here is to pick numbers and disprove ....

stmt 1 - say x = 31, 41 it works but x could also be 72, 82 ....... hence stmt 1 does not suffice

stmt 2 - does not suffice as shown above.

Combined not enough

Hence E
Hi, could you please explain how those examples you've given for statement 1 work?

As far as I can see, only numbers with 0 or 5 in the units digit would work.
@abhay

My bad I was trying to make the hundred's digit of 3x same as units of x. And when I reread I saw my error.

Thanks
Join the discussion