BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Integer constraints with inequalities question

Expert replies
by JGoode » Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:05 pm
This problem is from MGMAT's equations book. I'd be v.grateful if someone could explain Manhattan's working out that I've posted below in the spoiler section. I've posted my confusion in capitals also.

If x and y are nonnegative integers and x + y = 25, what is x?

(1) 20x + 10y < 300
(2) 20x + 10y > 280



[spoiler]Ans. is= (C); both statements together are sufficient.

Manhattan explains this as: "first, we should note that since x and y must be positive integers, the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25. If we combine the above two statements together we get:

so 280 < 20x + 10y < 300 (we can substitute (25-x) for y)
so 280 < 20x + 10(25-x) < 300
so 30 < 10x < 50
so 3 < x < 5

since x must be an integer, x must equal 4."

I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MANHATTAN STATES THAT X AND Y MUST BE POSITIVE INTEGERS WHEN ZERO IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER. ALSO, IF WE SUBSTITUTE X AS 0 AND Y AS 25 INTO THE 20x + 10y > 280, WE GET 0 + 250 > 280, BUT HOW CAN 250 BE GREATER THAN 280?

Thanks


[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by selango » Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:12 pm
Jgoode,

The approach is as below,

From both sttmts,we can rephrase as

280<20x+10y<300

Since x+y=25,y=25-x

Substitute this in the above ineqaulties.

280<20x+10(25-x)<300

280<10x+250<300

3<x<5

From this we can deduce x=4

There is no need for substituting x=0 and solving the equation.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:10 am
If x and y are nonnegative integers and x + y = 25, what is x?

(1) 20x + 10y < 300
(2) 20x + 10y > 280



from 1st : 2x+y<30

from 2nd : 2x+y>28

as given x and y are integers so from 1st and 2nd 2x+y=29..got it?

now we got 2 equations and 2 variables and we can get value of X...
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:04 am
I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MANHATTAN STATES THAT X AND Y MUST BE POSITIVE INTEGERS WHEN ZERO IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER.
In the solution, where it mentions that it is a "positive integer", Manhattan must have meant "non-negative integer", which accords to the question itself. 0 is non-negative but also not positive.

____

The above poster's approach is the best way of solving but we could have also solved it through substitution if the deduction evaded us:

What is x?

From the question stem, we have: x+y = 25 or y = 25 - x

(1) 2x + y < 30

so 2x + (25 - x) < 30

or x < 5...insufficient

(2) 2x + y > 28

so 2x + (25 - x) > 28

or x > 3...insufficient.

Combined, you know that x is an integer that is greater than 3 but less than 5, so it must be 4. Choose C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by outreach » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:29 am
Option 1

20x + 10y < 300
10x+10(x+y)<300
10x+250<300
10x<50
x<5

not suff

option 2
20x + 10y > 280
10x+10(x+y)>280
10x+250>280
10x>30
x>3
not suff

combining 1 and 2

3<x<5
hence x = 4



JGoode wrote:This problem is from MGMAT's equations book. I'd be v.grateful if someone could explain Manhattan's working out that I've posted below in the spoiler section. I've posted my confusion in capitals also.

If x and y are nonnegative integers and x + y = 25, what is x?

(1) 20x + 10y < 300
(2) 20x + 10y > 280



[spoiler]Ans. is= (C); both statements together are sufficient.

Manhattan explains this as: "first, we should note that since x and y must be positive integers, the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25. If we combine the above two statements together we get:

so 280 < 20x + 10y < 300 (we can substitute (25-x) for y)
so 280 < 20x + 10(25-x) < 300
so 30 < 10x < 50
so 3 < x < 5

since x must be an integer, x must equal 4."

I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MANHATTAN STATES THAT X AND Y MUST BE POSITIVE INTEGERS WHEN ZERO IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER. ALSO, IF WE SUBSTITUTE X AS 0 AND Y AS 25 INTO THE 20x + 10y > 280, WE GET 0 + 250 > 280, BUT HOW CAN 250 BE GREATER THAN 280?

Thanks


[/spoiler]
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by JGoode » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:43 am
Thank you very much everyone for your posts, the various explanations really help a lot and make things much easier!

Could I ask for some brief clarification regarding the first part of Manhattan's explanation: "first, we should note that since x and y must be positive integers, the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25." What purpose is there for finding the smallest possible value of 20x + 10y as being 250? 250 can't be greater than 280 as statement 1 indicates.

Outreach, you indicate in your approach:

20x + 10y < 300
10x+10(x+y)<300

could you explain why you went from 20x to 10x, I can't seem to figure out the reason (it's probably really obvious too).

Sorry if the questions seem basic as it's been a long time since I studied algebra/equations/inequalities so I very much appreciate all the help.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:01 am
20x + 10y < 300
10x+10(x+y)<300

could you explain why you went from 20x to 10x, I can't seem to figure out the reason (it's probably really obvious too).
20x + 10y < 300

or 10x + 10x + 10y < 300

or 10x + 10(x + y) < 300

But I think you are better off just dividing both of the inequalities by 10 as I did in my post above.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by JGoode » Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:29 am
I see now, thanks a lot Testluv for the explanation! That method is pretty ingenious actually and great to know. Much clearer now.

I've still not managed to understand why in the first part of Manhattan's explanation, they state: "the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25." What purpose is there for finding the smallest possible value of 20x + 10y as being 250? 250 can't be greater than 280 as statement 1 indicates. Surely all we need to know is that x+y=25 and substitute the terms where required?
Join the discussion