BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

SC

Expert replies
by hitmoss » Thu May 27, 2010 11:56 am
Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road
trip last summer, she has not been and probably never would be allowed
to drive
her father's car.

(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive
(B) has not been allowed to drive and probably never will be allowed to drive
(C) has not and probably never would be allowed to drive
(D) has not and probably will never be allowed to drive
(E) has not and probably never will be allowed to drive
Hitmoss:)

"Dreams are not what you see in sleep, Dreams is the thing does not let you sleep."
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by maiahoji » Thu May 27, 2010 12:02 pm
IMO A
I was doubting with B, but it is very wordy!
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu May 27, 2010 12:04 pm
Choose B

C-E are wrong because "has not" can't stand alone. You have to finish the compound verb.

A is wrong because of parallelism mainly. "has not been what? You have to complete the action before you move on to the next verb. Choose B
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu May 27, 2010 9:40 pm
IMO : A

What is the OA

Can somebody explain in detail
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Sat May 29, 2010 5:40 am
OA pl.....
Join the discussion

by SmarpanGamt » Sat May 29, 2010 11:07 am
hitmoss wrote:Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road
trip last summer, she has not been and probably never would be allowed
to drive
her father's car.

(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive
(B) has not been allowed to drive and probably never will be allowed to drive
(C) has not and probably never would be allowed to drive
(D) has not and probably will never be allowed to drive
(E) has not and probably never will be allowed to drive

Hi Hitmoss....

Its a tense issue ....IMO A ........bet/n choice A n B use of will seems more certain therfore would be allowed to drive is more correct

What is OA ?
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sat May 29, 2010 11:19 am
hitmoss wrote:Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road
trip last summer, she has not been and probably never would be allowed
to drive
her father's car.

(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive
(B) has not been allowed to drive and probably never will be allowed to drive
(C) has not and probably never would be allowed to drive
(D) has not and probably will never be allowed to drive
(E) has not and probably never will be allowed to drive
IMO B.

"Probably" and "would" convey same meaning...........redundant.

We need to have logical transition of tenses from present (perfect) to future.

I may be wrong :)
Join the discussion

by hitmoss » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:02 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
hitmoss wrote:Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road
trip last summer, she has not been and probably never would be allowed
to drive
her father's car.

(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive
(B) has not been allowed to drive and probably never will be allowed to drive
(C) has not and probably never would be allowed to drive
(D) has not and probably will never be allowed to drive
(E) has not and probably never will be allowed to drive
IMO B.

"Probably" and "would" convey same meaning...........redundant.

We need to have logical transition of tenses from present (perfect) to future.

I may be wrong :)


Hi friends,

The OA is B.
Hitmoss:)

"Dreams are not what you see in sleep, Dreams is the thing does not let you sleep."
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:30 am
will someone pl. explain again why A is wrong?

I guess there are instances where part of the sentences is left incomplete if both parts refer to a common verb.

Pl. suggest.....
Join the discussion

by outreach » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:44 am
(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive

"has not been" allowed to what?
would is incorrect

ansumania wrote:will someone pl. explain again why A is wrong?

I guess there are instances where part of the sentences is left incomplete if both parts refer to a common verb.

Pl. suggest.....
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by josh@knewton » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:30 pm
B) is the only answer which is parallel and which uses proper verb tenses. As maiahoji mentioned, it is true that at first glance, B sounds a bit wordy. However, it is the only grammatically correct answer choice. The sentence would also be grammatically correct if it read, "Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road trip last summer, she has not been and probably never will be allowed to drive her father's car," but this is not presented as an option.

Choice A): "Would" is incorrect in this case. The second part of the sentence describes an action that is likely to happen in the future, and thus should use the future tense ("will"). As FightWithGMAT put it, we need a logical transition of tenses from present perfect to future.

Choice C): This choice is not parallel. "She has not...be allowed to drive," does not make any sense. "Been" is needed to make the sentence parallel. Additionally, this choice also uses the incorrect "would" instead of "will."

Choice D): Like C, this choice is not parallel.

Choice E): Like C and D, this choice is not parallel.
Josh Anish
Senior Editor, Knewton
https://www.knewton.com
Join the discussion

by loveusonu » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:12 pm
outreach wrote:(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive

"has not been" allowed to what?
would is incorrect

ansumania wrote:will someone pl. explain again why A is wrong?

I guess there are instances where part of the sentences is left incomplete if both parts refer to a common verb.

Pl. suggest.....

Agree with Outreach. "Would" is used to describe assumptions of future done in past. Here is situation is in present. Hence 'would' is Incorrect. will go with D despite OA is B.

Please explain, if any1 have better ideas?
Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist
Join the discussion

by brijesh » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:07 pm
josh@knewton wrote:B) is the only answer which is parallel and which uses proper verb tenses. As maiahoji mentioned, it is true that at first glance, B sounds a bit wordy. However, it is the only grammatically correct answer choice. The sentence would also be grammatically correct if it read, "Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road trip last summer, she has not been and probably never will be allowed to drive her father's car," but this is not presented as an option.

Choice A): "Would" is incorrect in this case. The second part of the sentence describes an action that is likely to happen in the future, and thus should use the future tense ("will"). As FightWithGMAT put it, we need a logical transition of tenses from present perfect to future.

Choice C): This choice is not parallel. "She has not...be allowed to drive," does not make any sense. "Been" is needed to make the sentence parallel. Additionally, this choice also uses the incorrect "would" instead of "will."

Choice D): Like C, this choice is not parallel.

Choice E): Like C and D, this choice is not parallel.
Pls explain what is wrong with this sentence:

"Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road trip last summer, she has not been and probably will never be allowed to drive her father's car,"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1