effective legislator

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

effective legislator

by thephoenix » Sat May 22, 2010 3:45 am
P: Because an elected official needs the support of a political party to be effective, the independent candidate for the legislature cannot possibly be an effective legislator if she wins.
Q: I disagree. By your reasoning, our current legislator, who has the support of a political party, ought to have been effective, but he has hot been.
Which one of the following is the best criticism of Q's statement?
(A) It simply contradicts P's claim without offering evidence against it.
(B) It does not consider the possibility that a political party might decide to support an elected legislator even though he or she ran as an independent.
(C) It fails to provide a precise definition for a key term-the word "effective."
(D) It presupposes what is to be proved-that a legislator must have the support of a political party in order to be "effective."
(E) It mistakenly interprets P to be claiming that a factor assures rather than is necessary for a legislator's effectiveness.
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:22 am
Followed by:1 members

by gsinghal » Sat May 22, 2010 4:55 am
Confused b/w D & E.....will go with E

In D it says... legislator must have the support of a political party in order to be effective....while P says that elected official needs support of a political party.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Sun May 23, 2010 10:13 pm
IMO E

Legendary Member
Posts: 576
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:31 pm
Thanked: 97 times
Followed by:1 members

by liferocks » Sun May 23, 2010 10:26 pm
+1 for E.

(A) It simply contradicts P's claim without offering evidence against it.--Q has clearly given an example.Incorrect
(B) It does not consider the possibility that a political party might decide to support an elected legislator even though he or she ran as an independent.--This shows the flaw in reasoning of statement of P,not that of Q.Incorrect
(C) It fails to provide a precise definition for a key term-the word "effective."--out of context
(D) It presupposes what is to be proved-that a legislator must have the support of a political party in order to be "effective."--Q clearly does not agree with the claim that 'that a legislator must have the support of a political party in order to be "effective."'.hence it is not supposing this..incorrect
(E) It mistakenly interprets P to be claiming that a factor assures rather than is necessary for a legislator's effectiveness.--this is correct as P says to be an effective legislator one need to have support of a political party but reverse might not be true.Q clearly has missed this point.CORRECT
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll