BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Value of x ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Thu May 20, 2010 2:38 am
(1) x = 180 - w implies w = 180 - x
w + z = 240 implies 180 - x + z = 240. Since we don't know z, so x cannot be found.
Hence, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT to answer the question.

(2) w = y = z
x = 180 - w implies w = 180 - x.
z = x + (180 - y) implies w = x + (180 - w)
180 - x = x + (180 - (180 - x)
3x = 180 implies x = 60º
Hence, (2) is SUFFICIENT to answer the question.

The correct answer is (B).

Image
Last edited by Rahul@gurome on Thu May 20, 2010 4:31 am, edited 3 times in total.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Thu May 20, 2010 2:39 am
Let other two angles of the triangle be a and b and a+z=180 and y+b=180
w=a+b
z=b+x
y=a+x
From 1
w+z=240
or a+b+b+x=240
or 180+b=240
or b=60..no information about x...not sufficient

From 2
a+b=b+x or a=x
b+x=a+x or b=a
so a=b=x=60..sufficient

Ans option B
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by kstv » Thu May 20, 2010 2:52 am
Let the supplemmentary angles of W, Y and Z = x, y and z these are the internal angles of the triangle.
2) W=Y=Z
W= z+y , Y = x+z and Z = x+y
W+Y+Z = 2(x+y+z)
3W = 2*180°
W = 2*60 = 120
so x = 180 - 120 = 60 Suff.
1) W+Z = (y+z)+(x+y) = (x+y+z) + y = 180+y = 240
y = 60
Insuff
IMO B
Join the discussion

by rajeshsources » Thu May 20, 2010 3:18 am
I think the answer is B.

From the figure, we can say,
w = 180 - x ==> x = 180 - w.
x + 180 - y + 180 - z = 180 further solving we will get 180 + x - y - z = 0
substitute x = 180 - w, then, we will get
180 + 180 - w - y - z = 0
w + y + z = 360

Now look at the two statements sufficient or not.

Statement - 1
Given, w + z = 240, now substitute the same in w+y+z=360

then, we will get y=120, so that we can rewrite the sentence as,
x+ 180 - y + 180 - z = 180
substitute y = 120, then
x + 60 + 180 - z = 180
x - z = - 60 which we end up for calculating x , we need a value of either w or x.
So, statement-1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Statement - 2
Given w=y=z, then
As we have condition w+x = 180, we should get the equation by substituting w in place of y & z in the second equation, by that we can find x value, lets see,
the second equation is x + 180 - y + 180 - z = 180
then, x - y - z = -180, substitute w in place of y & z.
x - w - w = -180
x - 2w = -180 ( substitute w = 180 - x )
x - 2(180 - x) = -180
x - 360 +2x = -180
3x = 180
x = 60. It is UNIQUE, hence the statement is SUFFICIENT.

Then Answer is B (statement-2 alone is SUFFICIENT).

HTH, GOOD LUCK,

Thanks,
Rajesh,
Loves GMAT....!!!!
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu May 20, 2010 4:29 am
Right it should be (B).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion