BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

169) true factors

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by electrico » Thu May 13, 2010 11:34 pm
IMO B.

Since MX+NY is divisible by MN, the result of the dicision should be an integer. This is poosible when MN is a factor of YN, in which case the result would be MX, an integer.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Tue May 18, 2010 8:07 am
Solution
If MX+NY is divisible by MN, it means (MX+NY)/MN is an integer.
This means MN divides MX and MN divides NY.
So B: is true.
If MN divides MX, we have N divides X.
So A: is true.
If MN divides NY it means M divides Y.
Now if N divides X and M divides Y, then obviously MN divides XY.
So C: is also true.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by krazy800 » Tue May 18, 2010 9:07 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:Solution
If MX+NY is divisible by MN, it means (MX+NY)/MN is an integer.
This means MN divides MX and MN divides NY.
So B: is true.
If MN divides MX, we have N divides X.
So A: is true.
If MN divides NY it means M divides Y.
Now if N divides X and M divides Y, then obviously MN divides XY.
So C: is also true.
Rahul:

The question does not say M and N are different prime numbers

so what if M=3 and N=3

and if X=5 and Y=3 (both integers)

Then your expl does not hold good right?

Please let me know if am missing something
Aiming High
Join the discussion

by electrico » Tue May 18, 2010 9:37 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:Solution
If MX+NY is divisible by MN, it means (MX+NY)/MN is an integer.
This means MN divides MX and MN divides NY.
I dont think that it would be always true that If MX+NY is divisible by MN, it means (MX+NY)/MN is an integer.
This means MN divides MX and MN divides NY.

Let's say M =3 , N = 3 => MN=9

consider X = 1 and Y = 5, The statement no longer holds true.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Tue May 18, 2010 10:01 pm
Explanation for Krazy800

Here for the example you have taken MX+NY is 24 and MN is 9.
Since 9 does not divide 24, we cannot take this example.
Take for example M= 3 and N = 3, X = 5 and Y = 1.
Then MX+NY is 18 and MN is 9.
Obviously MX+NY is divisible by MN, but N is not a factor of X.
So A: is not true.
NY is 3 and MN is 9. Since 9 does not divide 3, even B: is not true.
XY is 5 and since 9 does not divide 5, C: is also not true.
So what you are saying is true.
In case M and N are same primes then none of them hold true.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion