BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

What is the value of r?

Expert replies
by nakul_anand » Sun May 02, 2010 5:12 pm
If m and r are two numbers on a number line, what is the value of r?

(1) The distance between r and 0 is three times the distance between m and 0.

(2) 12 is half way between m and r

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Sun May 02, 2010 5:33 pm
Clearly either of the condition alone is not sufficient.Combining
From 1,
m=x and r=3x
hence distance between m and r is=2x...when m,r are on the same side of number line
or 4x...when m,r are on the opp side of number line

From 2,
from this also we cannot conclude anything about absolute value of neither m nor r .Also distance between them is unknown.

both together alos not suff

Ans E
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Sun May 02, 2010 8:25 pm
from stmnt 1 we can't conclude any numbers, only the relationship between m and r. (this also makes me think about postive and negative so it is really that the /m/ is 3 times the /r/

For stmt 2 we now know that 12 is the average of m and r (if both are positive and the average of the absolute values if one is negative) but we can't tell what the numbers would be.

if we combine them we don't know anything further because we still have no indication of whether the numbers are positive or negative.

So E.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue May 04, 2010 5:56 am
nakul_anand wrote:If m and r are two numbers on a number line, what is the value of r?

(1) The distance between r and 0 is three times the distance between m and 0.

(2) 12 is half way between m and r

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
Guys, if we take M=6 & R=18, I see both conditions are used and satisfy them .

IMO C...


any thoughts on this??
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Tue May 04, 2010 9:41 am
Finding numbers that work doesn't mean that you have a value for R - the values of m=-12 and r=36 also work for both statements therefore we have r=18 or r=36 which doesn't solve a value problem.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue May 04, 2010 11:51 am
tpr-becky wrote:Finding numbers that work doesn't mean that you have a value for R - the values of m=-12 and r=36 also work for both statements therefore we have r=18 or r=36 which doesn't solve a value problem.
ooops!! I am sorry!
Join the discussion