BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

factors of n

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by thephoenix » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:51 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:57 am
thephoenix wrote:IMO E
I wonder how you arrived at your "IMO"
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:06 am
if pq means p*q
then my soln is
if p and q are 2 and 3 then s1) that is 2+3=odd is satisfied and q stem p*q=6 has 4 factors and thus satisfied
same is true for p and q are 2 and 5 respectievly
insuff

s2) not of much help

combining p can be 3 or 5 as seen above not suff

am i wrong
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:42 am
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:47 am
The function f(n) = the number of factors of n. If p and q are positive integers and f(pq) = 4, what is the value of p?

(1) p + q is an odd integer

Only even +odd=odd
so p,q can have a number of possibilities
f(pq)=4, where pq =25,34,49,....
p cannot be determined, (2) is insufficient

(2) q < p
f(pq)=4 , where pq can be 21,10...
so insufficient

(1) and (2) together gives number like 65,74,85... where p+q=odd and q<p

so E is the answer
Join the discussion

by pops » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:56 pm
neoreaves wrote:The function f(n) = the number of factors of n. If p and q are positive integers and f(pq) = 4, what is the value of p?

(1) p + q is an odd integer

(2) q < p
f(n) = number of factors on n
f(pq) = 4
now one factor of pq is 1 and second is pq
this implies only other 2 factors are p and q themselves.. that means p and q are prime !

statement 1: p+q is odd
sum of two primes is odd => one prime is 2
so either of p or q is 2

statement 2: q<p
now, for sure the smaller number is 2 hence q=2.. so we get no info about p

hence E..

important here is to arrive at p,q being prime..
if info was asked about q then aswer would have been C :)
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:02 pm
OA is E
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:41 am
I think one should quickly jump to the conclusion that the answer is E. Since they are asking us for a value and none of the statements give us any value, just number of factors, it is clearly insufficient.

E
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:41 pm
Great question here, guys - and, pops, you nailed the explanation:

The question tells us that the product pq has 4 factors. We know that every positive integer is divisible by itself and 1, so two of those factors are:

1
pq

And if p and q are positive integers, they're also factors, so the whole list is:

1
p
q
pq

p and q must be prime, because, if they weren't, then their factors would also be factors of pq, and there would be more than 4 factors.

(NOTE: I'm just paraphrasing pops - forgive me for taking any credit away from you!)

The really important point here, though, is the last one that pops makes. Because statement 1 tells us that the sum of p and q is odd, we know that one of them MUST BE 2, but we don't know which one. If we combine that with statement 2, which tells us that p is greater than q, then we know that q is 2: 2 is the only even prime number, and the lowest prime number, so p must be greater than 2.

So, if statement 2 were reversed to:

p < q

then we'd know the value of p as 2, and the answer would be C.

This is a great example of a couple of principles related to Data Sufficiency:

1) Often times on problems that seem very abstract like this one, you know a lot more than you think you do if you break the problem down further. Never just assume the answer is E because it looks hopeless at first glance.

2) If the answer is E, it's almost always just one step away from being C - the statements aren't sufficient, but only for one tiny factor like we saw above. Before you select E, try to identify that missing piece of evidence that you'd need, as it's highly unlikely that the GMAT will reward you for just saying "nope...too tough...can't do it".
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:04 am
eaakbari wrote:I think one should quickly jump to the conclusion that the answer is E. Since they are asking us for a value and none of the statements give us any value, just number of factors, it is clearly insufficient.

E
No, We cannot do that

Statement 1:
p + q is an odd integer

(p, q) = (2, 3) or (3, 2)
(p, q) = (2, 5) or (5, 2)
(p, q) = (2, 7) or (7, 2)
(p, q) = (2, 11) or (11, 2)
(p, q) = (2, 13) or (13, 2)

Not Sufficient.

Statement 2:
q < p
Not Sufficient.

Statement 1 and 2
q = 2 and p = 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17 etc
Not Sufficient

Answer: E

However, if p<p, then p = 2.
Join the discussion