A tough one from GMAT Prep

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:22 am

A tough one from GMAT Prep

by papumba2011 » Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:40 pm
In 1988, the council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping For a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change the companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
a) same
b) which had the simple thesis of consumer having
c) where the thesis was simple: consumer having
d) with a thesis that is simple one: consumer have
e) whose thesis was simple: consumers have
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:26 am
Thanked: 16 times

by student22 » Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:15 pm
B, I think. Parallelism between having and refusing. Which correctly refers to the book.

A. is wrong because it implies that the council on economic priorities had a simple thesis, rather than the book.

C is wrong because where can't refer to a book, it can only refer to a place.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:39 pm
GMAT Score:660

by tryingtocrack » Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:54 pm
IMO - B - which had the simple thesis of consumer having

which refers back to the "Shopping For a Better World" .

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:48 pm
It sounds awkward to say 'the simple thesis of consumers having ...' and this construction makes the sentence far too long. E is correctly written and concise, and it makes effective use of the colon to break the sentence into two shorter ones. I would have also liked 'which had a simple thesis: '
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:26 am
Thanked: 16 times

by student22 » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:39 pm
Kevin, I thought whose can't refer to a book?

Also, I thought the purpose of a semicolon, and not a colon, was to break up a sentence into two shorter ones.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:22 pm
I think Whose can refer to both people and things. But my question is on colon, I though colon is usually used to list a few things?

Vineet

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:40 pm
E is good
papumba2011 wrote:In 1988, the council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping For a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change the companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
a) same
b) which had the simple thesis of consumer having
c) where the thesis was simple: consumer having
d) with a thesis that is simple one: consumer have
e) whose thesis was simple: consumers have

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:11 am
Thanked: 6 times

by lkm » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:43 pm
vineetbatra wrote:I think Whose can refer to both people and things. But my question is on colon, I though colon is usually used to list a few things?

Vineet
Yes, WHOSE can refer to both People and Things.

COLON has multiple usage. It can used

1. To introduce logical consequences. (As used in the above question).
2. To introduce descriptive set (as you said).
3. Appositive
4. Direct Speech
5. Introduction of a definition.


Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colon_(punctuation)
The RULE Breaker
----------------------
I am born to fly, not to live in boundaries

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:11 am
Thanked: 6 times

by lkm » Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:48 pm
papumba2011 wrote: In 1988, the council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping For a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change the companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
a) same
b) which had the simple thesis of consumer having
c) where the thesis was simple: consumer having
d) with a thesis that is simple one: consumer have
e) whose thesis was simple: consumers have
B) is out because WHICH will point to WORLD whereas it should point to THE COUNCIL.
C) is out because WHERE is used for referring back to places.
D) is out because IS not correct tense over here.


Between (A) and (E), (E) is more clear and concise. Choose (E).
The RULE Breaker
----------------------
I am born to fly, not to live in boundaries

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:26 am
Thanked: 16 times

by student22 » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:04 pm
Well that's good to know that whose can refer to things. The reason I quickly eliminated that choice was because I thought it couldn't.

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
Thanked: 98 times
Followed by:22 members

by fibbonnaci » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:36 pm
hey 'whose' is a relative pronoun. Therefore it refers to the noun going just before it. Here in this case:'world'

how can E be correct? how can world have a thesis??

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:16 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:700

by samarpan_bschool » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:10 am
@fibbonnaci - Since 'shopping for the better world' is highlighted, i think we cannot separate it. So 'whose' should refer to 'shooping for the better world' - a single word

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:06 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by pops » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:53 am
lkm wrote:
papumba2011 wrote: In 1988, the council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping For a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change the companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
a) same
b) which had the simple thesis of consumer having
c) where the thesis was simple: consumer having
d) with a thesis that is simple one: consumer have
e) whose thesis was simple: consumers have
B) is out because WHICH will point to WORLD whereas it should point to THE COUNCIL.
C) is out because WHERE is used for referring back to places.
D) is out because IS not correct tense over here.


Between (A) and (E), (E) is more clear and concise. Choose (E).
Hey, can you please explain that if which points to world then why not where and whose?
I still feel B is the right choice !

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:30 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:740

by gmat_Tutor » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:10 am
In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.

A. with the simple thesis of consumers having
B. which had the simple thesis of consumers having
C. where the thesis was simple: consumers having
D. with a thesis that is a simple one: consumers have
E. whose thesis was simple: consumers have

First Grammar:
1."X of Karim having" is not correct.
=> "Preposition + Noun + Verb + ing" is wrong.
It could be "X of Karim's having" .
This rules out A and B.

2.Semicolon:
=> Before semicolon there should always be a clause. After semicolon there can be a list, or examples. After semicolon, there can be a clause.
=> C can be ruled out for not having finite verb after semicolon.
3."Thesis that is simple one" can be replaced by "a simple thesis".
=> This rules out D.
Answer is E.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 68 times
GMAT Score:680

by harshavardhanc » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:21 am
fibbonnaci wrote:hey 'whose' is a relative pronoun. Therefore it refers to the noun going just before it. Here in this case:'world'

how can E be correct? how can world have a thesis??
the noun that whose refers to is the book/publication : Shopping for a Better World

that's why you see the first letters as capitalized. It is one single entity and as rightly said by Samarpan, we cannot break it up in individual words to form different nouns.
Regards,
Harsha