BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value Problem-Taken From Manhattan Gmat!

Expert replies
by pkw209 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:03 pm
What is the value of y?

(1) 3|x^2 - 4| = y - 2

(2) |3 - y| = 11

Answer is C

My question is why can't you have two separate equations for statement 1----> -3x^2 + 4 = y-2 and 3x^2 - 12 = y-2? This would lead to x=2 or -2 and then y=2 and statement 1 would be sufficient.

Experts please help!

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:52 pm
pkw209 wrote:What is the value of y?

(1) 3|x^2 - 4| = y - 2

(2) |3 - y| = 11

Answer is C

My question is why can't you have two separate equations for statement 1----> -3x^2 + 4 = y-2 and 3x^2 - 12 = y-2? This would lead to x=2 or -2 and then y=2 and statement 1 would be sufficient.

Experts please help!

Thanks.
The two equations you've set up (small math errors aside) are ALTERNATIVE solutions, not MULTIPLE solutions.

In other words, when we have:

|x| = 2, we solve as:

+x = 2 OR -x = 2

whereas you've solved it as:

+x = 2 AND -x = 2.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:03 pm
Thanks, Stuart. However, I'm still a little confused. I looked at both x = 2 or x = -2 and the answer is y=2 for both so how come statement 1 isn't sufficient?

Sorry for not getting it.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:10 pm
pkw209 wrote:Thanks, Stuart. However, I'm still a little confused. I looked at both x = 2 or x = -2 and the answer is y=2 for both so how come statement 1 isn't sufficient?

Sorry for not getting it.
Because you haven't proven that x=2 or -2.

First, fixing the math errors:

3|x^2 - 4| = y - 2

|x^2 - 4| = (y - 2)/3

(to be safe, you should isolate the inequality before solving, although it doesn't matter here)

+(x^2 - 4) = (y-2)/3 OR -(x^2 - 4) = (y-2)/3

x^2 = (y-2)/3 + 4 OR -(x^2) = (y-2)/3 - 4

Since we have two variables in each equation, there's no possible way to solve either one.

You combined the two equations to solve, which as I explained in my original post, you're not allowed to do; they're alternative, not joint, equations.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:38 pm
got it. thanks
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:50 am
i'm getting the answer as "E". How come its "C". Can anybody explain?
Join the discussion

by boazkhan » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:07 am
This is how I solved it....I solved eq 2 first since its easier. We get two values of Y, -8 & 14. This alone is insufficent.
Eq 1 alone is also insufficent as we have two variables and one equation. Taking both equations together since Mod x^2-4 = y-2/3 will always be positive only the positive value of Y (y=14) will satisfy this equation. Therefore C is the answer.
Anyone..is this the correct approach?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:00 am
vertigo05 wrote:i'm getting the answer as "E". How come its "C". Can anybody explain?
yeah. u r partially true.But going a step further u can solve for Y without knowing value of X.

Now we have 2 values of Y (-8 & 14)

In st 1, the LHS will be positive for any value of X. So ,RHS also needs to be Postive .So we are left with Y =14.

Going bit more ahead....solve for X:(Not necessary here..just for ur happiness) hehehe

X can be 2 Sqrt 2 or -2sqrt 2 ,0
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:45 am
I gave an explanation for this question here: https://www.beatthegmat.com/value-of-y-t ... tml#201008
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:37 pm
Thanx Testluv. Gr8 explanation.
Join the discussion