BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Managers and Directors

Expert replies
by dumb.doofus » Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:17 pm
Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of employees on the task force are directors?
a] The average salary of managers on the task force is $5000 less than the avg salary of all the employees
b] The average salary of directors on the task force is $15000 more than the avg salary of all the employees
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:08 am
No. of directors = x
No. of managers = y

x/(x+y) ?

Statements 1 and 2 are clearly insufficient on their own. There is no link between the average salaries and the number of managers or directors.

Both statements together:

Let's say the average salary of ALL employees = z.

Using the concept of weighted average, we can setup the following:

(z + 15000)x + (z - 5000) y = z(x + y)
zx + 15000x + zy - 5000y = zx + zy
15000x = 5000y
3x = y

we can now use this equation to solve for x/(x+y). sufficient.

Choose C.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by pg850 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:29 am
Answer - C (Both are required)

I feel my solution wasnt the optimal one as it took about 5 mins to solve the question, if someone has a better method please let me know.

Soln:

Total no. of managers = M
Total no. of directors = D
Total no. of employees = E = M+D
Average salary of managers = x
Average salary of directors = y
Avg. salary of all employees = {Dy +(E-D)x}/E}

Therefore, answer = D/E

=> x = {Dy +(E-D)x}/E} - 5000 ---- 1
=> y = {Dy +(E-D)x}/E}+15000 ---- 2

From the two equations we can get the value of D/E as there are two unknowns (x and y)..since we are looking for D/E we do not count D and E as unknowns.

But, if you want to be sure, you can solve it:

solving 1 gives, y-x = (5000/D)*E
solving 2 gives, E(y-x-15000) = D(y-x)

Substitute y-x from 1,
which will give you D/E = 1/4 or 25%

Again, this approach looks a little too long for a GMAT question and if someone has a better solution please post it up.

-PG
Join the discussion

by pg850 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:35 am
bluementor's solution is much simpler!
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:07 pm
C is right. I was stuck in a similar approach as pg850. Thanks BM.
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by rdchandvadkar » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:13 am
can someone please explain this rite down to the basics.. just not getting this question..

thanks.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:27 am
rdchandvadkar wrote:can someone please explain this rite down to the basics.. just not getting this question..

thanks.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/avg-salary-a ... 23038.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/need-help-on ... t1225.html

Try these links and if your doubt persists, please post the specific doubt and I am sure people will be ready to help you
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by rdchandvadkar » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:31 am
got it myself...

but let me know if this approach is correct

no. of directors= x
no. of managers=y
total no of employees =x+y
average salary of all employees = z
total salary to all employees= z(x+y)
average of salary paid to directors =a
average of salary paid to managers =b

using weighted average formula;
z= (xa+yb)/x+y
z(x+y)= xa+xb............................eq1

from st(1)

z-b=5000; b=z-5000 not suff

from st2
a-z=15000; a=15000+z not suff

st(1) and (2) together
replacing in equation 1 values of b and a

z(x+y)= x(15000+z)+y(z-5000)
solving this we get; x/y=1/3
therefore using dividendo we get x/x+y=1/(3+1)=1/4=25%

is this ok??
Join the discussion

by ajith » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:39 am
rdchandvadkar wrote: therefore using dividendo we get x/x+y=1/(3+1)=1/4=25%

is this ok??
The solution is perfect. I would say it is a brilliant answer if it were a maths exam. If you are comfortable with the lengthy steps and time taken for the solution, I would say it is good in GMAT also.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by chaya009 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
That was a nice and simple explanation bluementor.

i knew that both the statements are together sufficient, but ran out of time in solving it.

Thanks.
Join the discussion