MGMAT RC - Javan Rhino

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

MGMAT RC - Javan Rhino

by hk_4u » Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:47 am
Measuring more than five feet tall and ten feet long, the Javan rhinoceros is often called the rarest large mammal on earth. None exist in zoos. Like the Indian rhino, the Javan has only one horn; African and Sumatran rhinos have two. While the Javan rhino habitat once extended across southern Asia, now there are fewer than one hundred of the animals in Indonesia and under a dozen in Vietnam. Very little is known about Javan rhinos because they lead secretive and solitary lives in remote jungles. Until recently, scientists debated whether females even have horns, and most scientific work has had to rely on DNA garnered from dung.
The near extinction of the Javan rhino is the direct result of human actions. For centuries, farmers, who favored the same habitat, viewed them as crop eating pests and shot them on sight. During the colonial period, hunters slaughtered thousands. Now, human efforts to save them may well prove futile. The Vietnamese herd is probably doomed, as too few remain to maintain the necessary genetic variation. Rhinos from Java cannot supplement the Vietnamese numbers because in the millions of years since Indonesia separated from the mainland, the two groups have evolved into separate sub-species. In Indonesia, the rhinos are protected on the Ujung Kulon peninsula, which is unsettled by humans, and still have sufficient genetic diversity to have a chance at survival. Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer. Thus, human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

by hk_4u » Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:49 am
The author's attitude toward current human efforts to save the Javan rhino can best be described as

(A) optimistic and worthwhile
(B) pointless and doomed
(C) idealistic but profitable
(D) problematic and ironic
(E) confused but heroic


OA - D

my question regarding the OA
[spoiler]
How do you justify problematic and ironic

D) CORRECT. The discussion of the mixed results and poor prognosis for the population in Vietnam justifies "problematic." The last sentence of the passage, observing that benevolence has proved little better than maltreatment justifies "ironic." Also, the author references the ironic quality of human protection of the Javan rhino in the 8th sentence in the 2nd paragraph, "Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer."

I am not convinced with this explanation.
It is ironic that the lack of human disturbance is helping the animal . But can you say that the author's attitude toward current human efforts is ironic ?

Similarly for problematic, Passage says that farmers used to shot the animal. How can you conclude something about current human efforts from this statement ?

Please clarify.[/spoiler]

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:41 am
I got this wrong too. I think B is closer to what the author actually did. While B is too extreme, problematic isn't accurate. imo
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:45 pm
hk_4u wrote:The author's attitude toward current human efforts to save the Javan rhino can best be described as

(A) optimistic and worthwhile
(B) pointless and doomed
(C) idealistic but profitable
(D) problematic and ironic
(E) confused but heroic


OA - D

my question regarding the OA
[spoiler]
How do you justify problematic and ironic

D) CORRECT. The discussion of the mixed results and poor prognosis for the population in Vietnam justifies "problematic." The last sentence of the passage, observing that benevolence has proved little better than maltreatment justifies "ironic." Also, the author references the ironic quality of human protection of the Javan rhino in the 8th sentence in the 2nd paragraph, "Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer."

I am not convinced with this explanation.
It is ironic that the lack of human disturbance is helping the animal . But can you say that the author's attitude toward current human efforts is ironic ?

Similarly for problematic, Passage says that farmers used to shot the animal. How can you conclude something about current human efforts from this statement ?

Please clarify.[/spoiler]
brother...here we have to look from the authors point of view(what is the authors attitude towards the human efforts)

Ironic : Since, it is according to the author(he states the last line with irony)
In real world, this may be fact or may not be fact(but author says so)

Problematic : read the last line "human benevolence may prove little better for " -- it means that human efforts may not prove much fruitful in saving rhinos.
Hence problematic attitude.

In such question, we should start looking for words in the passage like "may be" , "little better", "not good", "but" , "however"....bla...bla...bla....to find the author's attitude

sometimes we are asked --whats the author's style?

Whats the author's tone?

whats the author's attitude?

Just start searching for above said words.....you will definitely reach a conclusion.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

by hk_4u » Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:57 am
Problematic - not supported by any text in the passage

Ironic - just one example is stated . Cannot be termed as the overall tone of the passage

Instructors - Ron/Stacey/Stuart ...Please explain

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:26 am
hk_4u wrote:Problematic - not supported by any text in the passage

Ironic - just one example is stated . Cannot be termed as the overall tone of the passage

Instructors - Ron/Stacey/Stuart ...Please explain
If you read and understand the passage completely -- then you will make a conclusion that though people(humans) are trying their best to save Rhinos, their effort would prove futile or would be effortless in the end.

So the the issue here to save rhino will still be problematic(cannot be solved)

Also, if you read whole passage, you will find that author explains how the efforts of humans will go in vain.
For that you should read second last line "the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer" --so he is positive in this line .....but the immediate next line he says "human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment." --so he negates that.

This means that the second last line that he said, he meant the opposite of that. (that's what irony is right ;) )

Hope you understand.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:45 am
I was asked to contribute, which I'll do, although hrishi has aptly explained why B is correct.

Here are the two phrases that 100% support B:

"Now, human efforts to save them may well prove futile."

and

"Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer. Thus, human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment."

Since the entire passage is written in the author's voice (i.e. the author doesn't distance herself from the text with phrases like "some people believe" and "many biologists think"), both of those statements are believed by the author.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:56 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:I was asked to contribute, which I'll do, although hrishi has aptly explained why B is correct.

Here are the two phrases that 100% support B:

"Now, human efforts to save them may well prove futile."

and

"Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer. Thus, human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment."

Since the entire passage is written in the author's voice (i.e. the author doesn't distance herself from the text with phrases like "some people believe" and "many biologists think"), both of those statements are believed by the author.
Stuart,

Ironically u missed a point here..Its D and not B.

Plz post your explanation again. I am not convinced with option D completely. Yes it is ironic ..but I don't c Problematic

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:01 pm
gmatmachoman wrote: Stuart,

Ironically u missed a point here..Its D and not B.

Plz post your explanation again. I am not convinced with option D completely. Yes it is ironic ..but I don't c Problematic
That is ironic! However, I just got the letters mixed up - my explanation was in fact in support of D.

I could just post my explanation again, but I'm not sure how posting the same thing twice is useful.

The entire paragraph is devoted to discussing human responsibility for the poor disappearing rhinos and how human efforts to save theme are unlikely to be successful. The author describes problems with the attempts (e.g. Javanese/Vietnamese rhnios can't cross-procreate, no matter how much booze you give them), so "problematic" certainly applies.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

by hk_4u » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:29 pm
Hi Stuart

What really bothers me in this question is
The author's attitude toward current human efforts
Problematic and Ironic - are not emotions linked directly with the current human efforts

This quote
Ironically, however, the lack of human disturbance allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation the animals prefer.
is just an irony - not related to current human efforts

Similarly for problematic -

Earlier poster posted this as a support for problematic
Problematic : read the last line "human benevolence may prove little better for " -- it means that human efforts may not prove much fruitful in saving rhinos.
Hence problematic attitude.
I disagree as this statement is a positive thing happening for the rhino .

The only statement in the passage talking about current human efforts is
Now, human efforts to save them may well prove futile.

Please let me know where I am going wrong . More than anything else , I am interested in the way to approach such questions

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:20 am
Location: India
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by hrishi19884 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:00 am
Dear hk_4u brother,

I can understand what you are saying -- even like you, I am in fact not much convinced with the option D because there are just few lines in the whole passage that mean it ironically.

But look, in GMAT we find the "best possible answer" and not the "perfect answer"

Like we people say - Nobody is perfect! , GMAT also believes that - No OA can be perfect ;) ,whether it is SC or RC or anything.

Also, you would definitely not see an option in GMAT that is very easily noticeable and perfect, otherwise everyone will get 800.

Coming back to the question ----look at the options(OAs) properly

(D) problematic and ironic
(A) optimistic and worthwhile
(B) pointless and doomed
(C) idealistic but profitable
(E) confused but heroic

look at the difference, except D no option is even nearer to the attitude of author toward current human efforts to save the Javan rhino.

D -- can be a option(has some relevance in passage) -----possible option(not perfect ;) option)

A --- optimistic(author did'nt say that anywhere and not even he says its "worthwhile") -----ruled out

B -- pointless(did author say that?_ and doomed(means punishment) ....did author say that humans or rhinos are punished? No ------ruled out

C -- idealistic but profitable ...lol ...this is a complete opposite.-----ruled out

E -- confused but heroic --- heroic??? Are humans, author or rhino, heros of this story? Ofcouse not. --ruled out

Hence, we can only choose the nearer one and that is D.

and.....lol......I won't be surprised if you still don't get it(you have made me habitual now ;))
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"