BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Constance Horner

Expert replies
by soumyopriyosaha » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:11 am
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government's personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds not to hire the applicant
(C) an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

I am repeating this questions because the other discussions on this SC was not adequate.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:16 am
I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
Join the discussion

by vscid » Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:33 pm
osirus0830 wrote:I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
Why do you say so?
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:09 pm
vscid wrote:
osirus0830 wrote:I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
Why do you say so?
Pay attention to his threads. All of the sentences are awkward and you will see the experts come in and say that the sentence and all of the answer choices are wrong.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:07 pm
osirus0830 wrote:I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
Hey, this is a good question . I wonder y are u yelling at her!

Anyways IMO A seems to perfect
Join the discussion

by viidyasagar » Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:23 am
One more for A
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:09 am
soumyopriyosaha wrote:Constance Horner, chief of the United States government's personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.........seems no issue
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds not to hire the applicant.......not to hire is awkward
(C) an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them,.........them should refer to plural noun
(D) an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired.....they is incorrect pronoun for an applicant
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant's use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them...them is plural...an applicant is singular
Join the discussion

by soumyopriyosaha » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:19 am
osirus0830 wrote:I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
First, sorry if I offended you with my posts. I really do not intend to hide the source of any question, just that I was posting the questions from an error log I keep. Anyway I did some googling to find out the source for this one. Here it is:

https://thousandsc.blocked/2006/04/qn220.html

My only request is in future if you want to express your thoughts/feelings/grievances not related to GMAT please send me a pm, rather than discuss it on the forum.

Peace.
Join the discussion

by soumyopriyosaha » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:21 am
OA for this qs is A.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:24 am
soumyopriyosaha wrote:
osirus0830 wrote:I know you're not disclosing where you get these sentences from, but honestly, you are wasting your time with them. I'm almost convinced these sentences are constructed by people who learned English as a second language.
First, sorry if I offended you with my posts. I really do not intend to hide the source of any question, just that I was posting the questions from an error log I keep. Anyway I did some googling to find out the source for this one. Here it is:

https://thousandsc.blocked/2006/04/qn220.html

My only request is in future if you want to express your thoughts/feelings/grievances not related to GMAT please send me a pm, rather than discuss it on the forum.

Peace.
I didn't realize my post came off that strongly. I'm not offended, and didn't intend to offend. sorry for the misunderstanding
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1