BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value

Expert replies
by money9111 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:50 pm
I was going through one of my strategy guides and got tripped up on something. It seems very easy though. It's a general problem, not from an official guide or anything. It's actually from the MGMAT Number Property guide.

When does |x - 4| = 4-x? I feel dumb posing this question, but the answer is x less than or equal to 4. I got x=4. Can someone tell me why it's less than or equal to?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by papgust » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:14 pm
One best way of doing this is plugging numbers instead of doing algebraically.

As you see, when you insert numbers greater than 4, right hand side becomes negative and left hand side becomes positive. So, numbers greater than 4 does not satisfy this equation.

If you insert positive numbers <= 4 OR negative numbers, the left and right hand side gives the same value. So, the equation holds for values <= 4.
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:23 pm
when do you know when to solve algebraically vs. plugging in #'s?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:33 pm
Basically, algebraic approach and plugging in approach are two different methods to solve a problem. Most people get hold of both approaches and keep plugging in as a fallback option. On the test day, if you struggle to solve it algebraically, then you could use the plugging in method. So, there is no definite reason on when to solve algebraically or by plugging in. For the scenario mentioned above, you could use pluggin method.
Join the discussion

by sars72 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:42 pm
money9111 wrote:when do you know when to solve algebraically vs. plugging in #'s?
my first inclination is to solve each problem algebraically. However, if I can't go anywhere with the equation at hand, then I resort to pluggin in values based on the answer choices

For this question, |x - 4| = 4-x, i wo,uld break it down to two equations:

taking x-4 to be positive, --> x-4 = 4-x --> 2x = 8 --> x=4

taking x-4 to be negative, --> -(x-4) = 4-x --> -x+4=4-x -> 4=4, so we get nothing for x

since the second equation doesn't solve for x, we can't find the value algebraically and have to resort to plugging in
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:59 pm
i try to solve alg. first and then plug in but i wasn't sure if there was a specific rule for a type of question. with this question i thought maybe I missed a rule with absolute values where you need to switch to an inequality... but the above explanations make total sense...
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion