BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gold depreciated

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:20 am
Gold depreciated at a rate of X % per year between 2000 and 2005. If 1 kg of gold cost S dollars in 2001 and dollars in 2003, how much did it cost in 2002?

A.T*S/2

B. T * sq rt T/S

C.T sq rt S

D.T *S/sq rt T

E. sq rt T *S

OA E

I dint even know how to start solving this question :(
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by linkinpark » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:32 am
one of nice sums I've come across

ok here we go

2001 -> s
2002 -> s - (x*s)/100 => s(1-x/100) => s(100-x/100) (depreciates at x%)
2003 -> s - (x*s)/100 - (x/100) * (s - (x*s)/100) [basically x% further depreciation in next year]

now 2003 = T

so T = s - (x*s)/100 - (x/100) * (s - (x*s)/100)

the right hand turns out following way

T = s - x*s/100 - x*s/100 - x^2 * s/10000
T = s(10000 - 200x - x^2)/10000
T = s *(100-x/100)^2
sqr.rt(T) = sqr.rt(s) * (100-x/100)
sqr.rt(T) * sqr.rt(s) = sqr.rt(s) * sqr.rt(s) * (100-x/100)
sqr.rt(T * s) = s*(100-x/100) which is basically price in 2002 from above equations

HTH
530->480->580
when posting a question don't post OA(even masked) before some discussion.
Join the discussion

by rahul.s » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:43 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:Gold depreciated at a rate of X % per year between 2000 and 2005. If 1 kg of gold cost S dollars in 2001 and T dollars in 2003, how much did it cost in 2002?

A.T*S/2

B. T * sq rt T/S

C.T sq rt S

D.T *S/sq rt T

E. sq rt T *S

OA E

I dint even know how to start solving this question :(
i find that plugging in numbers is the best way to approach such problematic problems.
let's assume that the price of gold was 1000 per kg in 2000 and depreciated at a constant rate of 10% after 2000.

so in 2001, the price was 900 = S
in 2002, it was 810.
and in 2003, it was 729 = T

now, use the answer options to back solve. we need to find the option which gives us the price in 2002, i.e. 810

i always start with C.

you'll notice that only E gives us 810.

sqrt729 * sqrt 900 = 27 * 30 = 810
Join the discussion

by linkinpark » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:49 am
plugging numbers is a good solution but sometimes I feel it becomes matter of luck because on exam due to pressure you might panick considering 5 options to try and one doesn't know which one could be correct- but it depends on person to person :-). using equations I might take few seconds extra but I'm sure I'll land on correct answer
530->480->580
when posting a question don't post OA(even masked) before some discussion.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:34 am
yea i agree with linkinpark...
it depends from person to person...
i might be comfortable by plugging in #s and backsolving...
but who knows on D day i might get a right answer by going the equation way :)
Join the discussion