Even i'm getting D.
1. 25 is a factor of 5N
25=5*5
If 25 is a factor of 5N, N must have atleast one 5. So, 5 is a factor of N.
Sufficient.
2. 5N is a perfect square.
5N to be a perfect square, N must have atleast one 5. So, 5 is a factor of N.
Sufficient.
Is 5 a factor of N?
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
- linkinpark
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
- Location: Karjat
- Thanked: 3 times
N is not mentioned to be integer so I think there is a trap around that
consider in first statement N = 5*root(10) so 5N = 25*root 10
from second if 5N = perfect square and has 25 as factor, will give N to be a multiple of 5.
consider in first statement N = 5*root(10) so 5N = 25*root 10
from second if 5N = perfect square and has 25 as factor, will give N to be a multiple of 5.
- linkinpark
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
- Location: Karjat
- Thanked: 3 times
-
mehravikas
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
I agree that statement 2 is not sufficient by itself but statement 1 is.
According to your explanation if N = 5 root (10) still 5 would be a factor of N
Statement 2 is insufficient because N could be 1/5 5 * 1/5 = 1 which is a perfect sqaure
According to your explanation if N = 5 root (10) still 5 would be a factor of N
Statement 2 is insufficient because N could be 1/5 5 * 1/5 = 1 which is a perfect sqaure
linkinpark wrote:N is not mentioned to be integer so I think there is a trap around that
consider in first statement N = 5*root(10) so 5N = 25*root 10
from second if 5N = perfect square and has 25 as factor, will give N to be a multiple of 5.

















