BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS

Expert replies
by ukr.net » Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:34 am
What is the remainder when the positive integer x is divided by 8?

(1) When x is divided by 12, the remainder is 5.
(2) When x is divided by 18, the remainder is 11.

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient

ANS is C, why???
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS

by gabriel » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:50 am
ukr.net wrote:What is the remainder when the positive integer x is divided by 8?

(1) When x is divided by 12, the remainder is 5.
(2) When x is divided by 18, the remainder is 11.
from the first statement we have , x = 12a+5 , but with this we cant say what the remainder could be when divided by 8 .. so insufficient

from the 2nd statement we have, x = 18b+11, again we cannot tell what the remainder will be when divided by 8 .. so insufficient

Now, from here onwards it gets a little tricky...

The first number that satisfies both the conditions (the conditions given in statement 1 and 2) is 29 and subsequent numbers will be of the form 36*m+29 (36*m is a number that will be the multiple of the LCM of 12 and 18 ). To get subsequent numbers just substitute values of m as 1,2,3, ....

So, the numbers satisfying the 2 conditions are 29, 65 (36*1+29), 101 (36*2+29), 137(36*3+29) and so on ..

Now if we check the numbers for remainders after division with 8, we get the remainders as 5,1,5,1 .. that is the remainder could be 5 or 1 .. so even after combining the 2 statements we do not get a definite answer .. so the answer is E
Join the discussion

by cjiang16 » Sat May 10, 2008 7:08 pm
gabriel explanation is great!
Join the discussion

by gmattakers » Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:22 pm
thanks, gabriel
Join the discussion

by its time » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:13 am
that takes care of a lot many problems of intigers...thanks man!!brilliant....
Join the discussion

by sashi.dr » Sat Dec 26, 2009 1:26 pm
any easier method to determine the first no. as 29. i got it by trial and error.
Join the discussion