BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP 2006 #1

Expert replies
by Perminology » Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:14 pm
Hello all, was having some trouble with the following questions. Since GMAT Prep doesn't provide explanations, what better place to ask than at beatthegmat? here goes.

9. Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail? (1 mile= 1.6 km)
1) Pei walked this distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/h
2) On average, it took Pei more than 9 minutes per km to walk this distance.

OA D Still don't understand this one.

36. The attendees of a certain convention purchased a total of 15,000 books. How many of the attendees were female?

1) There was a total of 4000 attendees at the convention
2) Males purchased an average arithmetic mean of 3 books each, and the females purchased an average of 5 books each.


OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by viju9162 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:35 pm
Hi Perminology,

My reasoning is as follows:

First sum

Question : Did pei take more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles ( Answer type should be Yes or NO)

(1) Walks at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/hr

Assume he walks with the speed 6.4 km/hr( This is the maximum).

Therefore, 6.4 = 10 * 1.6 / time.
=> time = 2.5 hours.

With his maximum speed, pei has taken 2.5 hours. Even if you gradually reduce his speed, he will take more time to travel. Hence, A is sufficient.

(2) On average, pei takes more than 9 minutes/km

Pei takes for example 10 minutes ( minimum) ( because it is more than 9 mins), to travel 1 km. Therefore, by proportion.

For 1 km, he takes 10/60 hour, .i.e 1/6 hour to travel, then
For 10*1.6 km, how much time will he take?

He will take at least 2.6 hours to cover the distance. As he takes more time to travel 1 km, he will definitely take more than 2.6 hours to cover the whole distance.

Therefore, B is also sufficient.

From the above (1) and (2), answer should be
D

Second Sum

Question: How many are females?

From the question, we know that 15,000 books are sold ( keep this info, we will use it in the solution)

(1) Total of 4,000 people attended.

If n(m) - number of males and n(f) - number of females.
Then n(m) + n(f) = 4,000

Cannot find number of females

(2) average is mentioned for both male and female

3 = T(M) / n(m)
5 = T(F) /n(f)

T(m) - Total books purchased by males
T(F) - Total books purcahsed by females

Cannot find about number of females

Combine both (1) and (2)

From the question, we know T(M) + T(F) = 15,000 . Substitute T(M) and T(F) from(2)

3*n(m) + 5*n(f) = 15,000
from ( 1) n(m) = 4,000 - n(f)
3* ( 4,000 - n(f)) + 5*n(f) = 15,000
n(f) = 1500

You got the answer :-).

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Perminology » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:07 pm
Hey Viju, thanks for the great post. The ratio question seems so easy now. In fact I've done questions like that before and got them right. Careless mistakes tend to be my biggest enemy on the GMAT. I appreciate your input for each question, but I have big beef with the Rate Time Distance questions. Tell me if you think what I have to say has some weight.

1) Walks at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/hr

We shouldn't assume that he did walk at 6.4, for all we know it could be 2.1, or 0.1. Thus we would have multiple values for time. For the same reason x<0, x could be a fraction or negative, there's no way of knowing for sure without sufficient information. Thus I thought statement 1 was insufficient.

2) On average, pei takes more than 9 minutes/km

Same problem here. We're given a minimum. Ignoring statement 1, he could have walked 120 minutes/km. The range of values is so large that it is insufficient. It's like asking "what is the value of x?" with a choice x>15. Insufficient right?

Thus, combining both we're given a range of rates. Thus if we can calculate for the range of rates, then we can know min/max of time based on two definite limitations for rates, while each alone is so ambiguous. So I chose C. Thoughts?
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:26 pm
Hi Perminology,

You are right to certain extent, but you didn't consider other values given in the question. The author states that pei walks at an average less than 6.4 km/hr;however, the author also gives you the distance. This information needs to be utilized to arrive at the answer. I think you missed here.

Similarly, for choice 2, you relied on only one data. It is good to utilize the given data to arrive at the answer. The information is spread across in question, answer, ...

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Perminology » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:47 pm
Thanks Viju, looks like I obsessed over the range. The fact that the distance is supplied definitely makes each choice sufficient. Thanks for your help, it was the first time I encountered a rate time distance question with inequalities.
Thanks!
Join the discussion