BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

need help with ration, mixtures and alligation

Expert replies
by readsid » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 am
Q1: the weights of 3 heaps of sand are in the ratio 5:6:7. the first two heaps were increased by a fractions of themselves such that the ration of the weights chaged to 7:6:5.

i) by what fraction the frist increased ?
1. 24/25
2. 2/5
3. 12/13
4. 19/20

ii) By what fraction was the second increased?
same options as above

no matter how many problems i work out i get stuck in some or the other problem related to this chaper.. i guess im missing on some basic funda ... can someone give me notes on this chapter or book that i could refer to???
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by loi.fu.yogi » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:41 am
The problem needs only the fraction. Hence we can substitute our values to get the fraction.

Any ratio will have greatest common factor removed.For example: if heaps weighed 50,60, and 70, we state the ratio as 5:6:7, removing the gcf 10.

In our problem we have two such ratios and a connecting link between them. we can substitute our own numbers for gcf and equate them to get the fraction.

The key is last heap's weight has remained constant but the ratio has changed. Assume weight of last heap is 7x. After changes to first two heap, the weight of last heap is 5y. Since last heap weight has not changed y= 7x/5.

Now we need to substitute a good number for x. Assume x=5. => y=7.

Now the initial weights of 3 heaps are as follows: 5x:6x:7x - Substitute x=5 - 25:30:35

Modified weight of 3 heaps : 7y:6y:5y - substitute y=7 - 49:42:35

Now cross check the last heap's weight, whether it has remained constant after substitution. Since it is 35 in both the case, we are good.

The difference in first heap = 49-25 = 24. Hence the fraction of change 24/25.
The difference in second heap = 42-30 =12. Hence the fraction of change 12/30 => 2/5.
Join the discussion

by readsid » Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:54 am
thanks yogi....
hit and trial method... but will this work for all the problems??
can somebody break this down without using the hit and trial method ??
Join the discussion