BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

solution plz

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:51 pm
brick2009 wrote:I could not understand this problem...help plz


If x is an integer, does x have a factor n such that 1 < n < x?

(1) x > 3!

(2) 15! + 2 ≤ x ≤ 15! + 15
Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: focus on the question stem.

The first word that should jump out is "does"; the answer to a "does" question is either "yes" or "no", so we're dealing with a yes/no question.

The next thing we need to understand is the question itself. We know that 1 and x are definitely factors of x, the question is are there any other factors of x? Well, what numbers don't have any factors other than 1 and themselves? Primes! So, the question is really asking:

Is x NOT a prime number?

which we can just rethink as:

Is x a prime number?

since we don't really care what the answer is, we just care whether we can get a definite answer.

Now that we've greatly simplified the question, let's move on to:

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: consider each statement by itself.

(1) looks much simpler, so let's start here.

x > 3!

or

x > 3*2*1

or

x > 6

If x is greater than 6, could it be prime? YES
If x is greater than 6, could it be non-prime? YES

Since x may or may not be prime, (1) is insufficient.

(2) 15! + 2 ≤ x ≤ 15! + 15

This statement is much trickier - we really have to understand factorials and factoring.

15! is simply 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13*14*15

Therefore, 15! is a multiple of every integer from 1 to 15.

Well, if 15! is a multiple of 2, then 15! + 2 is also a multiple of 2.
If 15! is a multiple of 3, then 15! + 3 is also a multiple of 3.
If 15! is a multiple of 4, then 15! + 4 is also a multiple of 4.
.
.
.
If 15! is a multiple of 15, then 15! + 15 is also a multiple of 15.

So, if x is an integer (info from the question stem) and is in the range provided (info from statement (2)), then x is DEFINITELY NOT a prime number.

Step 3 of the Kaplan Method for DS: if necessary, combine the statements.

One of the statements was sufficient alone, so no need to combine!

(2) is sufficient alone: choose B.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by November Rain » Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Hi

I think the answer is B. Could you please confirm to me the OA?

The question is asking if X is a prime number.

(1) Only says that X is bigger than 6. But you have several primes bigger than 6, so it's insufficient.

(2) Says that X is a number that has, at least, a factor of 2 (15! + 2) or a factor of 3 (15! + 3), or a factor of 4 (15! + 4) etc... or a factor of 15 (15!+15). So whatever the real number, X will always have at least one factor, so X is not prime. Sufficient
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:29 pm
Let's rephrase the statement 2 as 4! + 2 <= x <= 4! + 15

Therefore 26 <= x <= 39

Using this we still can't confirm that x is not a prime number? What's the difference if 4! is replaced by 15!?
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
brick2009 wrote:I could not understand this problem...help plz


If x is an integer, does x have a factor n such that 1 < n < x?

(1) x > 3!

(2) 15! + 2 ≤ x ≤ 15! + 15
Step 1 of the Kaplan Method for DS: focus on the question stem.

The first word that should jump out is "does"; the answer to a "does" question is either "yes" or "no", so we're dealing with a yes/no question.

The next thing we need to understand is the question itself. We know that 1 and x are definitely factors of x, the question is are there any other factors of x? Well, what numbers don't have any factors other than 1 and themselves? Primes! So, the question is really asking:

Is x NOT a prime number?

which we can just rethink as:

Is x a prime number?

since we don't really care what the answer is, we just care whether we can get a definite answer.

Now that we've greatly simplified the question, let's move on to:

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method for DS: consider each statement by itself.

(1) looks much simpler, so let's start here.

x > 3!

or

x > 3*2*1

or

x > 6

If x is greater than 6, could it be prime? YES
If x is greater than 6, could it be non-prime? YES

Since x may or may not be prime, (1) is insufficient.

(2) 15! + 2 ≤ x ≤ 15! + 15

This statement is much trickier - we really have to understand factorials and factoring.

15! is simply 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13*14*15

Therefore, 15! is a multiple of every integer from 1 to 15.

Well, if 15! is a multiple of 2, then 15! + 2 is also a multiple of 2.
If 15! is a multiple of 3, then 15! + 3 is also a multiple of 3.
If 15! is a multiple of 4, then 15! + 4 is also a multiple of 4.
.
.
.
If 15! is a multiple of 15, then 15! + 15 is also a multiple of 15.

So, if x is an integer (info from the question stem) and is in the range provided (info from statement (2)), then x is DEFINITELY NOT a prime number.

Step 3 of the Kaplan Method for DS: if necessary, combine the statements.

One of the statements was sufficient alone, so no need to combine!

(2) is sufficient alone: choose B.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:40 pm
mehravikas wrote:Let's rephrase the statement 2 as 4! + 2 <= x <= 4! + 15

Therefore 26 <= x <= 39

Using this we still can't confirm that x is not a prime number? What's the difference if 4! is replaced by 15!?
The difference is the number you're adding at the end; 15 is more than 4.

4! must be a multiple of 2, 3 and 4, but doesn't have to be a multiple of 5, 6, 7, ..., 15, so we can't use the same reasoning.

Each of the following would be analagous to (2):

4! + 2 <= x <= 4! + 4
9! + 2 <= x <= 9! + 9
100! + 2 <= x <= 100! + 100

or, in more general terms:

n! + 2 <= x <= n! + n

and would be sufficient to conclude that x isn't a prime number.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:43 pm
I get it now... :-) !!

Thanks so much.
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
mehravikas wrote:Let's rephrase the statement 2 as 4! + 2 <= x <= 4! + 15

Therefore 26 <= x <= 39

Using this we still can't confirm that x is not a prime number? What's the difference if 4! is replaced by 15!?
The difference is the number you're adding at the end; 15 is more than 4.

4! must be a multiple of 2, 3 and 4, but doesn't have to be a multiple of 5, 6, 7, ..., 15, so we can't use the same reasoning.

Each of the following would be analagous to (2):

4! + 2 <= x <= 4! + 4
9! + 2 <= x <= 9! + 9
100! + 2 <= x <= 100! + 100

or, in more general terms:

n! + 2 <= x <= n! + n

and would be sufficient to conclude that x isn't a prime number.
Join the discussion