BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mistake in OG? Q80 in QR! Please help!

Expert replies
by gmatnov09 » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:20 pm
For Q80 of the Official Guide, Quant. Review, I think there is a mistake. Please tell me if I'm wrong, I just can't understand how the OG is right here.

80. If xy>0, does (x-1)(y-1)=1

(1) x+y = xy
(2) x = y

Let's focus on (2)
If x=y, substituting in y for x gives you (y-1)(y-1)=1
Therefore y^2 -2y +1 = 1
Up to here me and the OG agree!

However, now I believe this can be solved. The 1's cancel out, leaving y^2 - 2y = 0
The y can be factored, giving y(y-2) = 0.

The GMAT claims this cannot be uniquely solved for y. BUT the question says that xy>0. That means that Y CANNOT BE 0. If y was 0, xy = 0! Therefore, y must equal 2. Therefore statement 2 IS sufficient, and the answer is D not A.

What are everyone's thoughts?
And is there a list somewhere of OG mistakes?

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by palvarez » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:28 pm
gmatnov09 wrote:For Q80 of the Official Guide, Quant. Review, I think there is a mistake. Please tell me if I'm wrong, I just can't understand how the OG is right here.

80. If xy>0, does (x-1)(y-1)=1

(1) x+y = xy
(2) x = y

Let's focus on (2)
If x=y, substituting in y for x gives you (y-1)(y-1)=1
Therefore y^2 -2y +1 = 1
Up to here me and the OG agree!

However, now I believe this can be solved. The 1's cancel out, leaving y^2 - 2y = 0
The y can be factored, giving y(y-2) = 0.

The GMAT claims this cannot be uniquely solved for y. BUT the question says that xy>0. That means that Y CANNOT BE 0. If y was 0, xy = 0! Therefore, y must equal 2. Therefore statement 2 IS sufficient, and the answer is D not A.

What are everyone's thoughts?
And is there a list somewhere of OG mistakes?

Thanks!

Is (x-1)(y-1) = 1
or is xy = x+y?

look at (2): x = y, xy = x+y when x= y = 0 or when x = y =2. rule out x= y = 0


xy = x+y when x = y = 2
but xy <> x+y when x = y <> 2
Join the discussion

by gmatnov09 » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:39 pm
Thanks, I get it now. The question was just asking IF we know that it equals 1. Totally missed it.
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:10 am
i still dont understand how come 2 is not sufficient??
Join the discussion