BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A decent DS question - Inequalities

Expert replies
by mjsobo » Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:42 pm
A decent DS question:

Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| < 4

(2) |x-3| < 4

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data are needed.

We are trying to see if x is positive. Let's look at each statement alone. For 1), this statement simplifies to -7<x<1, so from this we don't know if x is positive. For 2), this statement simplifies to -1<x<7, so again, we don't know if x is positive or negative.

Let's see if combining them helps. If you think of them on a number line, Statement 1 includes all values between -7 and 1. Statement 2 includes all values between -1 and 7.

The only overlap between those two inequalities is between -1 so when we combine the two statements, we have -1<x<1, so again, this is still insufficient because we don't know if x is positive or negative, could be both.

So the answer is E, statements together are not sufficient.
Martin
GMAT Instructor with Grockit
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by deagez » Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:25 pm
I like to use -1, 0, 1 (or any other integer that makes the premise either false or true) for this type of problem. (usually just two of the three can quickly get you an answer)

(1) 0+3 <4 = true
1+3 <4 = false

NOT SUFF

(2) 0-3 <4 = true
7-3 <4 = false

Not SUFF

Now when it is time to combine lets use x as 0 because both equations are true. So we have to find a positive value for X that works for either (1) and (2) and disproves X>0 . X=1 is good because it works for premise (2), so you have multiple answers for X, and answer is E.

Also just to Note "Let's see if combining them helps. If you think of them on a number line, Statement 1 includes all values between -7 and 1. Statement 2 includes all values between -1 and 7. " as written above is not true. X can not be 7 in (2)or -7 in (1)
Join the discussion

by fireplayer » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:10 am
E for me, pls post OA
Join the discussion