BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Confusing Inequalities + absolute value

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Harbinder » Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:28 pm
Stmt 1 doesn't give a unique value but Stmt 2 can only be true if the both sides of the inequality are zero so x should be 3
so IMO the answer should be B
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:30 pm
Well, there is no algorithmic approach; or such an algorithmic approach would be so inefficient that you end up wasting time.

Here, you are given that y is non-negative.

Look at (2) |x-3| <= -y

-y is either 0 or negative. However, |x-3| is either 0 or positive. So, |x-3| = -y = 0

x = 3. Sufficient on its own.


(1) |x-3| >= y >= 0
x value changes based on y. Insufficient.


Concept: absolute values are always non-negative. Geometrically, any distance is non-negative.

|x-3| >=0 as well.
depending on y, x value changes. Insufficient.
Join the discussion

by life is a test » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:20 am
notice that both statements are giving you the same information since the only the sign of the y variable differs on the right hand side, the absolute value remains unchanged.

from either of the statement we get x<=-y+3 or x<=y+3.
subtracting the eqns gives us -2y=0->y=0 so x<=3 which still doesnt help determine an exact x-value.

hope that helps
Join the discussion

Re: Confusing Inequalities + absolute value

by Testluv » Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:17 pm
yregister wrote:Hi, writing my Gmat on 9th but still really confused about these inequalities. Can someone help and explain ?

if y >= 0, What is the value of x?

1) |x-3| >= y

2) |x-3| <= -y

OA:B
Hi yregister,

Absolute value measures how far away from zero on the number line something is.

For example:
|x| = 5 would tell us that x is five units either to the right or else to the left of zero. Therefore, x either equals 5 or -5.

|x| < 5 would tell us that x is fewer than five units away from zero. So either x < 5 or else x >-5 (Remember, a "large" negative number is very small; visualize or draw a number line on these questions!)

Because absolute value is a measure of distance, it is always positive (or else zero).

Looking at this question:

The stem tells us that y is positive or zero. To have sufficiency, we need a single value for x.

Statement one:

1) |x-3| >= y

The equation is telling us that x-3 is at least y units away from zero on the number line. But remember that we don't know y's value. It can be zero or any positive number. x's value would clearly change if y was 10 versus 1,000.

Insufficient.

Statement two:

2) |x-3| <= -y

Okay, so we see the absolute value bars on the left. That means the left hand side is most definitely positive. Therefore, the right hand side must also be positive. (The two sides of the equation must equal each other). But, the equation tells us it is less than or equal to the right side...where we see a negative sign.

We have to fix this; we have to find a way to make the right hand side positive or zero. (We have to figure out how to satisfy the information in the statement--that info is always true!)

Well, y must be either positive or zero (from the stem).

But, if y were positive we would have:

|x-3| <= (-)(+)

And because the left hand side must be positive or zero, we would have:

pos or zero <= some negative number

That's clearly imposstible.

Thefefore, y can't be positive and must be zero.

Se we have:

|x-3| <= 0

But x-3 cannot be fewer than zero units away from zero (because distance is positive), so we have:

|x-3| = 0

x-3 = 0

x= 3

Statement one is not sufficient by itself; statement 2 is; choose B
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion