BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

What is the value of x?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:48 am
IMO B
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by Harbinder » Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:22 pm
How does B work for any number?
IMO it should be E ...what's OA
Join the discussion

Re: What is the value of x?

by Testluv » Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:41 pm
uptowngirl92 wrote:What is the value of x?

sq root(x^4)=9
sq root(x^2)=-x
Hi uptowngirl92,

We need a single value for sufficiency.

The first statement tells us that the square root of x^4 is 9.

square both sides:

x^4 = 81

square root both sides:

x^2 = 9

x^2 - 9 = 0

(x-3)(x+3) = 0

x = +3 or -3

Statement one yields two values. Not sufficient.

There is no value in the second statement, so it is not sufficient.

combo:

We know that x is +3 or -3.

But if x were +3, -x is -3, and we would have:

sqrt (3^2) = -3
sqrt 9 = -3
3 = -3

This equation is clearly impossible, leaving only one value for x (-3).

The statements, although insufficient in isolation, are sufficient in combination. Choice C

There is no need to prove that -3 would satisfy the equation in the second statement but:

if x = -3, then -x = -1(-3) = +3
Last edited by Testluv on Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

Re: What is the value of x?

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:43 pm
uptowngirl92 wrote:What is the value of x?

sq root(x^4)=9
sq root(x^2)=-x
First thing we need to understand: by mathematical convention, the phrase "square root of" or the square root symbol are translated as "the positive square root of".

So, for example, if a question read "x is the square root of 25", we would know that x is +5. Similarly, if we see the square root hat over a number, we only worry about the positive root.

With that in mind, let's look at the statements:

(1) sqroot(x^4) = 9

In other words, the positive square root of x^4 is 9.

Well, 9^2 is 81. So, we know that x^4 = 81.

If x^4=81, do we have just one possible value for x? No: x could be +/- 3... insufficient.

(2) sqroot(x^2) = -x

Right off the bat we can say this is insufficient alone, since it doesn't give us a value at all.

However, since we're about to combine, let's think about what it means.

We know that "the positive square root of x squared equals negative x".

How is this possible? Well, the positive square root is, of course, positive. So, the left side of the equation must be positive.

Since the left side is positive, the right side must also be positive. If -x is positive, x must be negative.

Accordingly, from (2) we know that x is negative.

Now let's combine the statements:

1) x = 3 or -3
2) x < 0

Together, x must be -3... sufficient, choose C.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:47 pm
Guys but I got the answer as B..can't understand why C is the correct answer..
from B alone we get x=0..so suff.. :(
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:56 pm
uptowngirl92 wrote:Guys but I got the answer as B..can't understand why C is the correct answer..
from B alone we get x=0..so suff.. :(
Here is the mistake you commited.

2. sqrt(x^2) = -x
in other words, |x| = -x.

Solve for x when |x| = -x.

|x| = -x whenver x <=0

or x can be anything in [0, +inf). Multi-valued. Insuff.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:04 pm
uptowngirl92 wrote:Guys but I got the answer as B..can't understand why C is the correct answer..
from B alone we get x=0..so suff.. :(
Hi uptowngirl92,

actually from statement two alone, you get absolutely nothing, other than that x must be negative (or zero). We have no info about "x" so x can be any (negative) number in the world (or zero).

(Remember, you have to ignore statement one when evaluating statement two. Here, that would mean that when you are looking at statement two, you have absolutely no info about x, other than that it is negative).
Last edited by Testluv on Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:20 pm
stmt2 we have:
>>sq root(x^2)=-x
>>x=-x
This is possible only when x=0
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:40 pm
uptowngirl92 wrote:stmt2 we have:
>>sq root(x^2)=-x
>>x=-x
This is possible only when x=0
The square root of a number is always positive (or zero).

We have:

sq root (x^2) = -x

|x| = -x (and not x = -x because, again, can only take the square root of a positive number)

|x| = -x will hold for any negative number, x (or zero).

Statement two only tells us that x is negative (or zero).

And, from a strategic standpoint, you also know x CANNOT be zero: If x were zero and only zero, then statement two would be contradicting statement one, which established that x was either plus or minus 3. In DS, the statements can NEVER contradict each other.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

Re: What is the value of x?

by life is a test » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:43 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote: First thing we need to understand: by mathematical convention, the phrase "square root of" or the square root symbol are translated as "the positive square root of".
Stuart, if I understand correctly can I simply add an absolute sign around the value of the square root to avoid confusing myself;

e.g. can I think of statement 1 as follows :

sq root(x^4)=9-> |x^2| = 9 -> x^2 = 9 or x^2 = -9.

thanks.
Join the discussion