BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Combinatorics #1

Expert replies
by papgust » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:08 am
How many numbers between 200 and 1200 can be formed with the digits 0,1,2,3 if repetition of digits is allowed?

A. 48
B. 63
C. 32
D. 14
E. 20

My Solution:
First, i'm splitting 3-digit and 4-digit sets like 201-999 as set-1 and 1000-1199 as set-2

For set-1, Hundred-digit * tens-digit * units-digit = 2 possibilities * 4 possibilities * 4 possibilities => 32

Similarly for set-2, Thousand-digit * Hundred-digit * tens-digit * units-digit = 1 possibility * 2 possibilities * 4 possibilities * 4 possibilities => 32

Therefore, 32+32 in total = 64.
But the OA is 63. Why do we subtract the total by 1 here? Can someone clarify my doubt and explain? This is not a GMAT problem for sure. I'm very weak in this subject and i'm working hard on it to build my fundamentals. I hope my steps to solve the problem are correct.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by NikolayZ » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:05 am
Hey mate.
You included number 200 in your answer, that is why you have to subtract 1 from 64.

3 digit integer.
XXX
Hundreds - 2,3 - total 2
Tens - 0,1,2,3 - total 4
units - 0,1,2,3 - total 4
Look, Number 200 is totally allowed by the set we have established, hence you have to subtract 1.

Hope it helped.
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:58 pm
I dont get it. Looks like both 200 & 1200 are included in the computation. Am I missing something?
Join the discussion

by Talkativetree » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:10 pm
I did this problem by calculating the total number of possible combo's for 1200 and subtracting the total number of possible combo's for 0000-0200.

# of possibilities

0000-1200
2x3x4x4=96

0000-0199(0200)
1x2x4x4 = 32+1

so total possibilities would equal 96-33=63?

either way, I would think 1200 wouldn't be in the set eitehr, so then wouldn't it be 62?
Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:03 pm
Thanks NikolayZ,

That helps and cleared my doubt.
Talkativetree wrote: either way, I would think 1200 wouldn't be in the set eitehr, so then wouldn't it be 62?
Yes, 1200 is not included here. Otherwise it would be 62.
Join the discussion