BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

composite integer

Expert replies
by dikku07 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:05 am
An integer greater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n.

(2) The tens digit of n is 2.



A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.



My answer choice doesn't match OA so, need an better explanation. will post OA later for sure
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: composite integer

by kaulnikhil » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:06 am
dikku07 wrote:An integer greater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n.

(2) The tens digit of n is 2.



A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.



My answer choice doesn't match OA so, need an better explanation. will post OA later for sure
A
Join the discussion

by mohitsharda » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:54 pm
Statement 1: we can have 61,21 both. ( Many more are also possible, but lets take these two)
21- composite
61- prime
=> not sufficient

Statement 2: we can have 23,24 and so on.
23 is prime, 24 is composite
=> not sufficient

Statement 1&2:
Only 2 cases possible
21 and 22
Both composite
=> sufficient
hence C
MS
Join the discussion

by dikku07 » Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:26 am
I think this one is tricky. we all are getting diff answers. any more explanations or I'll post OA soon
Join the discussion

by DarkKnight » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Mohit, please check statement 1. It says the tenth digit is a factor of unit digit not multiple. Hence number 21 and 61 does not qualify. The only numbers that would qualify are 24, 26, 33, 36,39 which are all composite. Hence sufficient.

Statement 2: Tenth digit =2 can be 23 or 21. Can't say. not sufficient.
Therefore answer A.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:54 am
pick number

a, tens digit is 2, 3, 4, the unit digit is 4-6-8, 6-9 and 8,

a is sufficient

b, tens digit is 2, so the number is 23 or 24 not suffieicn

A is answer
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:47 am
DarkKnight wrote:Mohit, please check statement 1. It says the tenth digit is a factor of unit digit not multiple. Hence number 21 and 61 does not qualify. The only numbers that would qualify are 24, 26, 33, 36,39 which are all composite. Hence sufficient.

Statement 2: Tenth digit =2 can be 23 or 21. Can't say. not sufficient.
Therefore answer A.
IMO C

Mohit is right but gave wrong example
1. 17 : prime
18 : composite

2. 29 : prime
28 : composite

1 and 2: no. is composite
Join the discussion

by DarkKnight » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:23 pm
Hi Vaibhav,

I think the problem states that two digit integer n is greater than 20. That renders 17 - invalid example of prime.

29 - Here tens digit (which is 2) is not a factor of units digit of n (Which is 9). That renders 29 invalid as well.

Unless my train of though is wrong, just by using statement A you will discover that there is no prime number greater than 20 that will satisfy condition A. Hence it has to be composite. Hence answer is A.

Do you agree?
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:32 pm
DarkKnight wrote:Hi Vaibhav,

I think the problem states that two digit integer n is greater than 20. That renders 17 - invalid example of prime.
You are right, it was late night and I think I was sleepy :(


29 - Here tens digit (which is 2) is not a factor of units digit of n (Which is 9). That renders 29 invalid as well.

I have given 29 as example for statement 2 which doesn't have any condition of divisibility. so 29 is fine.


Unless my train of though is wrong, just by using statement A you will discover that there is no prime number greater than 20 that will satisfy condition A. Hence it has to be composite. Hence answer is A.

Do you agree?


Plz read inline comments. You are right, its A
Join the discussion

by hypermeganet » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:58 pm
Isn't it A?

2 is the ones digit of 32 but 32 isn't composite. So 2 alone isn't sufficient.

If the number is greater than 20, and the tens is a factor of the ones digit, it can't be prime, ever.
Join the discussion

by srivas » Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:21 pm
It is A only
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:08 pm
It HAS to be A.
Join the discussion

by Dobrov » Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:51 pm
A. OA?
Join the discussion