BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

flying acrobats raring to go!

Expert replies
by ashish1354 » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:12 pm
The flying acrobatic team is made up of 120 airplanes. The team wants to form a rectangular formation with X planes in a row and Y planes in a column. If the number of airplanes in a row is no less than 4 and no more than 30, how many different combinations of rectangular shapes are possible?

(a) 4.
(b) 5.
(c) 6.
(d) 8.
(e) 10.

can someone show a fast way to solve this
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: flying acrobats raring to go!

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:21 am
ashish1354 wrote:The flying acrobatic team is made up of 120 airplanes. The team wants to form a rectangular formation with X planes in a row and Y planes in a column. If the number of airplanes in a row is no less than 4 and no more than 30, how many different combinations of rectangular shapes are possible?

(a) 4.
(b) 5.
(c) 6.
(d) 8.
(e) 10.

can someone show a fast way to solve this
For the formation to be a rectangle, we can see that X and Y must be factors (divisors) of 120.
Once we select the value of X (# of planes in a row), the value of Y follows (e.g., if X=20, then Y must equal 6).
So, how many values of X can we have?
Well, let's list all of the factors of 120.
120: {1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12,15,20,24,30,40,60,120}
Given the conditions for the values of X in the question, we see that X can equal 4,5,6,8,10,12,15,20,24,and 30
So, the answer is E

As far as a "quick" way to find divisors is concerned, we could use a nice rule involving the prime factorization (see below), but the restrictions regarding the value of X prevent this from being as useful as usual. For this question, listing the divisors might be the fastest way.

Aside:
Finding the total number of divisors of positive integer N:
- Write the prime factorization of N
- If the prime factorization of N = (W^a)(X^b)(Y^c). . ., then the total number of divisors of N=(a+1)(b+1)(c+1)...
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

interpretation problem

by vivekjaiswal » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:19 pm
Hi,

I somehow (mis)interpreted the statements 'no less than 4' and 'no greater than 30' as 4<x<30 :(

Any tips to watch out for such word translations?


Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

interpretation problem

by vivekjaiswal » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:52 pm
Hi,

I somehow (mis)interpreted the statements 'no less than 4' and 'no greater than 30' as 4<x<30 :(

Any tips to watch out for such word translations?


Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

Re: interpretation problem

by mohitsharda » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:18 pm
vivekjaiswal wrote:Hi,

I somehow (mis)interpreted the statements 'no less than 4' and 'no greater than 30' as 4<x<30 :(

Any tips to watch out for such word translations?


Cheers,
Vivek
For this you need to ask the question.
i.e. is 4 less than 4? Ans: No.
=> 4 is no less than 4.
same for upper limit:
is 30 greater than 30? Ans: No.
=> 30 is no greater than 30.
MS
Join the discussion