BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is xy<6?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by p2dski » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:50 pm
I'm a noob but I'll take a shot in the dark.

Answer: B

Is xy<6?

First thing to note is that this is a yes/no question. So write down yes/no.

1.) x<3 and y<2
INSUFFICIENT:
If x is 2 and y is 1 then yes, xy is less than 6. But what if x is -5 and y is -2? Then it would be +10. So it is insufficient data.

2.) 1/2 < x < 2/3 and y^2 < 6

We know x is a positive fraction. A spot in between 1/2 and 2/3. So x is a positive fraction. y^2 (anything squared is always positive)is less than 6. This must mean that xy is less than 6.

So the answer is "NO" however, it doesn't matter. We have enough data to decide with 2.) so the answer is B.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
"Patience, persistence and perspiration make an unbeatable combination for success." -Napoleon Hill
Join the discussion

by fruti_yum » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:38 am
p2dski wrote:I'm a noob but I'll take a shot in the dark.

Answer: B

Is xy<6?

First thing to note is that this is a yes/no question. So write down yes/no.

1.) x<3 and y<2
INSUFFICIENT:
If x is 2 and y is 1 then yes, xy is less than 6. But what if x is -5 and y is -2? Then it would be +10. So it is insufficient data.

2.) 1/2 < x < 2/3 and y^2 < 6

We know x is a positive fraction. A spot in between 1/2 and 2/3. So x is a positive fraction. y^2 (anything squared is always positive)is less than 6. This must mean that xy is less than 6.

So the answer is "NO" however, it doesn't matter. We have enough data to decide with 2.) so the answer is B.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
IMO C.. Let me know if i'm correct.. I'll post my solution
Join the discussion

hmm

by JeffB » Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:58 pm
I say B too.
Join the discussion

by pathaniaus » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:20 pm
I say B too.
Join the discussion

by navalpike » Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:54 pm
p2dski wrote: So the answer is "NO" however, it doesn't matter. We have enough data to decide with 2.) so the answer is B.

.
I wonder what you mean by that. B gives us the answer that "yes, xy < 6".
Join the discussion