BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x,y, z

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: x,y, z

by ketkoag » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:06 am
tohellandback wrote:If xyz ≠ 0, is x (y + z) ≥ 0?


1) |y + z| = |y| + |z|
2) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

OA later
IMO C coz if we take either statement then both y an z or x and y will have the same sign.. and hence we don't know what could be the sign of x(y + z).

but if we take both the statements then we know that x, y, z should have the same sign and then we know that x(y+z)>0..
hence C..
Join the discussion

Re: x,y, z

by tohellandback » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:11 am
ketkoag wrote:
tohellandback wrote:If xyz ≠ 0, is x (y + z) ≥ 0?


1) |y + z| = |y| + |z|
2) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

OA later
IMO C coz if we take either statement then both y an z or x and y will have the same sign.. and hence we don't know what could be the sign of x(y + z).

but if we take both the statements then we know that x, y, z should have the same sign and then we know that x(y+z)>0..
hence C..
could you elaborate the statement in bold?
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

Re: x,y, z

by life is a test » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:51 am
1) |y + z| = |y| + |z| --> this implies that both y and z are positive.
e.g. if y=1 and z=-2 then |(+1) + (-2)| = -1 but |+1| + |-2| = 3 so y and z must both be positive for the eqn to hold. This however, still doesn't tell us about x (it couldn be +ve or -ve, all we know about z form the given info is that is is non-zero.

2) |x + y| = |x| + |y|--> for similar reasons as in 1), x and y must both be positive byt we don't know about z (it can be positive or negative)

1) and 2) together, we know that x, y and z are positive hence x(y+z) must be >0.
Join the discussion

Re: x,y, z

by Sher1 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:22 pm
life is a test wrote:1) |y + z| = |y| + |z| --> this implies that both y and z are positive.
e.g. if y=1 and z=-2 then |(+1) + (-2)| = -1 but |+1| + |-2| = 3 so y and z must both be positive for the eqn to hold. This however, still doesn't tell us about x (it couldn be +ve or -ve, all we know about z form the given info is that is is non-zero.

2) |x + y| = |x| + |y|--> for similar reasons as in 1), x and y must both be positive byt we don't know about z (it can be positive or negative)

1) and 2) together, we know that x, y and z are positive hence x(y+z) must be >0.
I dont think the equations imply they are both positive.
Join the discussion

IMHO

by kc_raj » Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:03 pm
IMHO C,

for first to be true both y, z has to be same sign, but x could be any sign and magnitude so not suff.

similarily for second to be true both x, y has to be same sign, but z could be any sign and mag so not suff,

combined x, y, z has to be same sign, either all positive or all neg, either way x(y+z)>=0

so C
Join the discussion

by imhimanshu » Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:36 am
wots the OA?
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:43 am
OA is C
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by lazyfox » Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:56 am
|y + z| = |y| + |z| --> this implies that both y and z are positive.
e.g. if y=1 and z=-2 then |(+1) + (-2)| = -1 but |+1| + |-2| = 3 so y and z must both be positive for the eqn to hold. This however, still doesn't tell us about x (it couldn be +ve or -ve, all we know about z form the given info is that is is non-zero.


****************************************************
The statement implies that both y and z have same signs: both positive or both negative.

|4+5| = |4| + |5|
|-4-5|= |-4|+|-5|[[/spoiler]
Join the discussion