Marbles

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

Marbles

by crackgmat007 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:43 pm
A certain jar contains only 'b' black marbles, 'w' white marbles, and 'r' red marbles. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white?

(1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

(2) b -w > r

OA - A
Rephrase --> is r>w

In stmt 1, since b is added to the both denominators, can I say that b = 0 (for computations sake) and get r/w > w/r; simplifying, I get rephrase r>w.

Is my approach correct? Thoughts pls!
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:12 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ashis979 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
Yup, question is indeed asking "is r>w?"

I would have done it this way (probably the same thing as you have, but just makes more sense to me)

Let the total number of marbles be X. Therefore, X=b+w+r

Stmt 1:
r/(b+w)>w/(b+r)
=> r/(b+w+r-r)>w/(b+r+w-w)
=> r/(X-r)>w/(X-w)
=> rX-rw>wX-rw (okay to cross multiply because X has to be greater than both r and w)
=> rX>wX
=> r>w (okay to cancel out since X>0)
Therefore Stmt 1 is SUFFICIENT.

Stmt 2 obviously insufficent.