BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

multiples

Expert replies
by Uri » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:28 pm
what could be the value of the product of the positive integers m, n and p, if 21m +28n = 24p?

I. 84
II. 168
III. 672

(A) I
(B) I & II
(C) I and III
(D) I, II and III
(E) None of the above

OA: [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]

Please explain your logic.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: multiples

by Vemuri » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:01 pm
This is an interesting question. Thanks for posting.

Given, 21m+28n=24p ==> 7*(3m+4n)=6*4p. We are asked to find out which of the products satisfy this condition.

Remember m, n & p are 3 different numbers

I. 84 = 2*2*7*3. If m=4, n=3 & p=7, the condition is satisfied. So, I is a possible product

II. 168 = 2*2*2*7*3. Now, based on I, we know that this condition is not possible, because a common number should multiply across all the numbers to make sure that the equation is satisfied. So, this condition is not valid.

III. 672 = 2*2*2*2*2*7*3. This is similar to I, with 2 as a common multiple across m,n & p. So, III is a possible product.

Hence C.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:03 pm
Wow; whats the source.....

21m +28n = 24p

7 (3m+4n) = 24 * p

p has to be alteast 7

3m+4n = 24

m=4 n=3 p=7

84 possible

672 = 84*8


Lets see if we can provide an extra 2 to each of m,n,and p and see

3m+4n = 24
3*4 + 4*3 = 24

3*4*2+4*3*2 = 24*2

24+24 = 48

m=8 n=6 p =14

672 possible

168 = 84*2

If either m,n or p has this extra 2 can we make 3m+4n = 24 work

3*4+4*3= 24

3*4*2 + 4*3 cannot equal 24

i.e m=8 n=3 p=7 not possible i.e 168 not possible

3*4+4*3*2 = 24 not possible

m=4 n=6 p=7 not possible i.e 168 not possible

3*4+4*3 = 24*2

m=4 n=3 p=14 not possible i.e 168 not possible


So rule out II


I am sure Ian/Stuart or others may have a easier way to rule out II

C
Join the discussion

by sacx » Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:25 am
21m +28n = 24p

Divide the equation by 28,

3/4*m + n = 6/7*p

The simple solution to this equation would be when m = 4, n = 3 and p = 7.

and every value of m,n and p will satisfy the equation as long as each of the variable is multiplied by the same number.

eg,
multiply each of the variable (m, n and p) by 2. m = 8, n = 6 and p = 14
multiply each of the variable by 3. m = 12, n = 9 and p = 21

1. 84 = 4*7*3. from this m = 4, p = 7 and n = 3. We know these value satisfy the equation

2. 168 = 4*7*3*2. Now there is an extra 2 in the factors hence it will not satisfy the equation

3. 672 = 4*7*3*2*2*2 OR 8*14*6 and that satisfies our equation


Choose C
SACX
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:33 am
multiply each of the variable (m, n and p) by 2. m = 8, n = 6 and p = 14
multiply each of the variable by 3. m = 12, n = 9 and p = 21
I had a slightly different approach heading in the same direction..PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER MY APPROACH IS RIGHT OR NOT.

the given equation becomes

3m+4n=24/7 p

tht means that m is a multiple of 3 shud be divisible by 3

n is multiple of 4 so shud be divisible by 4

and p shud be divisible by 7

thus the number mnp shud be the LCM of 3,4 and 7 and their equal multiples ie 6,8 and 14 or 9,12,21 etc.

this is satisfied by I and III

The problem gets solved within some seconds.

thus C
Join the discussion

by Uri » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:30 pm
PAB2706 wrote:the given equation becomes
3m+4n=24/7 p
tht means that m is a multiple of 3 shud be divisible by 3
n is multiple of 4 so shud be divisible by 4

and p shud be divisible by 7
Could you pleae explain the part in red font a little bit more? I don't think that m is a multiple of 3 and n is a multiple of 4 and others have already shown this above your post.
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Thu May 14, 2009 7:08 am
Uri wrote:
PAB2706 wrote:the given equation becomes
3m+4n=24/7 p
tht means that m is a multiple of 3 shud be divisible by 3
n is multiple of 4 so shud be divisible by 4

and p shud be divisible by 7
Could you pleae explain the part in red font a little bit more? I don't think that m is a multiple of 3 and n is a multiple of 4 and others have already shown this above your post.
Udi,
What is the source of the question here?
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by Uri » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:32 am
i got it from some other online forum....don't remember it now. sorry :(
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:10 am
IMO C because:
21m +28n = 24p
LCM of 21,28, and 24 =168
we can find the values of m,n and p where
21m=28n=24p
the values are m=8, n=6, p=7
for these values 21m+28n=2 *24p
so if we divide each m and n by 2, we get the values we want

m=4,n=3,p=7..product =84
for all values that are multiple of these numbers, our conditions will satisfy
m=8,n=6,p=14--product =672

you cannot get 168 because that means you are only multiply any one of the numbers with 2.

so C
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion